HomeCompareBullhorn vs SEEK

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Bullhorn vs SEEK

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Bullhorn and SEEK tie at 54.

Bullhorn, filed under ATS-integrated, and SEEK, filed under Screening, tie at 54 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Bullhorn leads 2 of the 7 criteria and SEEK 4, with 1 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Bullhorn 58, SEEK 40 — and at an 18% weight it carries 78% of the weighted advantage Bullhorn holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Bullhorn is filed under ATS-integrated AI, SEEK under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordBullhornSEEK
Price tierHighMid
HeadquartersUSAU
Founded19991997

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 40% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Bullhorn 58 · SEEK 40

    3.2 weighted points to Bullhorn

  2. 12% weight · 62% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Bullhorn 35 · SEEK 50

    1.8 weighted points to SEEK

  3. 20% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Bullhorn 62 · SEEK 70

    1.6 weighted points to SEEK

  4. 15% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Bullhorn 38 · SEEK 32

    0.9 weighted points to Bullhorn

  5. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Bullhorn 60 · SEEK 64

    0.3 weighted points to SEEK

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Bullhorn 60 · SEEK 62

    0.2 weighted points to SEEK

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +0.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Bullhorn minus SEEK.

CategoryWeightBullhornSEEKΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6270-8-1.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%5840+18+3.2
FRIA Support15%3832+6+0.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%6060--
Human Oversight Design12%6062-2-0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3550-15-1.8
Customer Documentation8%6064-4-0.3
Total100%54 (F)54 (F)-+0.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBullhornSEEK
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11—11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%156Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain237Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Bullhorn has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; SEEK has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SEEK sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Bullhorn, across 2 distinct source domains, and 30 for SEEK, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Bullhorn last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SEEK last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.