HomeCompareCanditech vs Recruitee

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Canditech vs Recruitee

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

3 points separate Recruitee and Canditech.

Recruitee (ATS-integrated) edges Canditech (Assessment) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 42 to 39. Recruitee leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Canditech leads 1, including FRIA Support, and 2 are level. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Post-Market Monitoring (Canditech 32, Recruitee 40) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Canditech 37, Recruitee 42), the second being 29% of the weighted advantage Recruitee holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Canditech is filed under Assessment AI, Recruitee under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Canditech is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCanditechRecruitee
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersILNL
Founded20192015

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 26% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Canditech 37 · Recruitee 42

    1.0 weighted points to Recruitee

  2. 12% weight · 50% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Canditech 32 · Recruitee 40

    1.0 weighted points to Recruitee

  3. 18% weight · 73% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Canditech 25 · Recruitee 30

    0.9 weighted points to Recruitee

  4. 12% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Canditech 53 · Recruitee 58

    0.6 weighted points to Recruitee

  5. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Canditech 30 · Recruitee 27

    0.4 weighted points to Canditech

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -3.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -3.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Canditech minus Recruitee.

CategoryWeightCanditechRecruiteeΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3742-5-1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2530-5-0.9
FRIA Support15%3027+3+0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5252--
Human Oversight Design12%5358-5-0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%3240-8-1.0
Customer Documentation8%5858--
Total100%39 (F)42 (F)-3-3.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCanditechRecruitee
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%1111
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%117Sources on the vendor's own domain147Sources on the vendor's own domain

Canditech has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Recruitee has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Canditech, across 1 distinct source domain, and 21 for Recruitee, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Canditech last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Recruitee last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.