Canditech
Canditech is a skills-assessment and job-simulation platform that screens candidates with work-sample tests, technical and soft-skill assessments, and one-way video interviews, using AI agents to auto-score open-text and video responses.
HireAIScore rates Canditech 39 out of 100 (grade F, Substantial gaps) under rubric v1.0, last reviewed July 17, 2026. Canditech ranks 44 of 49 vendors rated in Assessment AI, against a category average of 48. That score is drawn from 18 evidence items across 7 rubric criteria for Canditech — 11 with a cited source, 7 recording that nothing was located.
§ 01 - Company facts
- Legal name
- Canditech Ltd.
- Founded
- 2019
- Headquarters
- Israel · IL
- Pricing tier
- Mid
- Market side
- Employer-side (AEDT)
- Categories
- AssessmentScreeningVideo interview
- Website
- canditech.io
These are company details, not findings. They are editable by a verified representative and carry no weight in the score, which is built only from the cited evidence below.
§ 02 - Score breakdown
§ Score breakdown
Category scoring
Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.
- 01
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Weight 20%37
+7.4 · category avg 53
- 02
Bias Audit Transparency
Weight 18%25
+4.5 · category avg 47
- 03
FRIA Support
Weight 15%30
+4.5 · category avg 32
- 04
Data Governance Disclosure
Weight 15%52
+7.8 · category avg 55
- 05
Human Oversight Design
Weight 12%53
+6.4 · category avg 55
- 06
Post-Market Monitoring
Weight 12%32
+3.8 · category avg 39
- 07
Customer Documentation
Weight 8%58
+4.6 · category avg 59
Category avg is the mean raw score on that criterion across the 49 Assessment AI vendors in scope of this rubric, this one included.
§ 03 - Strongest · weakest
Strongest category
Customer Documentation
Raw score 58 · contributes 4.6 to total.
58 against a 59 category average
Weakest category
Bias Audit Transparency
Raw score 25 · contributes 4.5 to total.
25 against a 47 category average
§ 04 - Cited evidence
Download diligence record→§ Evidence
Cited per category
Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence.
Evidence ledger
- Items
- 18
- Documentation
- 9
- Public statement
- 2
- Absence
- 7
- With a source URL
- 11 of 18
- Source hostnames
- 1
- Fewest items
- 2
- Bias Audit Transparency
These figures measure how thoroughly Canditech was reviewed, not how Canditech performed — an absence row, recording that nothing was located, is counted like any other item.
Article 11 Technical Documentation
3 items37
- DocumentationCaptured Jul 17, 2026
Product page describes an AI assessment builder and AI auto-scoring using pre-configured or custom 'agents' but provides no model cards, technical specification, or explainability documentation.
- DocumentationCaptured Jul 17, 2026
FAQ states that for video responses only the written transcription is analyzed (excluding accent, tone, and appearance), a limited fairness-by-design/explainability statement rather than a formal technical pack.
- AbsenceCaptured Jul 17, 2026
No model or system cards, AI technical documentation, standalone explainability statement, or ISO 42001 certification found on the Trust Center or any product page.
Bias Audit Transparency
2 items25
- AbsenceCaptured Jul 17, 2026
No NYC Local Law 144 bias audit, independent third-party audit (BABL AI, ORCAA, Warden AI, Holistic AI, etc.), or academic audit found on the Trust Center, FAQ, or product pages.
- Public statementCaptured Jul 17, 2026
Company claims bias is reduced via standardized, automated scoring and work-sample validity, but presents no measured adverse-impact or independent audit results.
https://www.canditech.io/validity-and-reliability-in-assessments/
FRIA Support
2 items30
- AbsenceCaptured Jul 17, 2026
No EU AI Act Article 27 Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment template, deployer-obligation guidance, or AI Act conformity documentation found anywhere on the site.
- DocumentationCaptured Jul 17, 2026
Trust Center offers a GDPR Data Processing Agreement and a privacy/security package, but nothing addressing fundamental-rights or EU AI Act deployer obligations.
Data Governance Disclosure
3 items52
- DocumentationCaptured Jul 17, 2026
Trust Center lists ISO/IEC 27001:2013, GDPR compliance, AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.3 in transit, AWS EU hosting with disaster recovery, and annual penetration testing.
- DocumentationCaptured Jul 17, 2026
FAQ discloses that video AI scoring uses only the transcription and excludes accent, tone, appearance, and recording environment, a specific data-exclusion practice.
- AbsenceCaptured Jul 17, 2026
No disclosure of what data trains the AI models (or whether customer data is used), no training-data exclusion list, and no ISO 42001.
Human Oversight Design
3 items53
- DocumentationCaptured Jul 17, 2026
FAQ states teams 'can always review, adjust, and override any score before a hiring decision is made,' an explicit human override control.
- Public statementCaptured Jul 17, 2026
AI is positioned as decision support with team review ('doesn't replace interviews, it makes them count'), keeping humans in control of hiring decisions.
- AbsenceCaptured Jul 17, 2026
No per-jurisdiction configuration toggles, audit-log documentation, or in-interface explanation of how individual AI scores are derived is described publicly.
Post-Market Monitoring
2 items32
- DocumentationCaptured Jul 17, 2026
Trust Center describes annual penetration testing, ongoing infrastructure and application monitoring, and a CISO-led security team and Security Forum.
- AbsenceCaptured Jul 17, 2026
No public status/uptime page, published vulnerability-disclosure policy or security contact, or model-update changelog found.
Customer Documentation
3 items58
- DocumentationCaptured Jul 17, 2026
Public FAQ covers AI auto-scoring behavior, bias reduction, GDPR/DPA, encryption, and human oversight in plain language.
- DocumentationCaptured Jul 17, 2026
Trust Center plus a GDPR DPA, combined with product pages, a Help Center, blog, glossary, and test library, form a substantial customer resource hub.
- AbsenceCaptured Jul 17, 2026
No NYC Local Law 144 or EU AI Act-specific deployer/compliance guidance is published for customers.
§ 05 - Editorial notes
Company overview
Canditech, founded in 2019 and headquartered in Tel Aviv, Israel, is a pre-employment skills-assessment platform built around job simulations and work-sample tests. It offers a library of 500+ tests plus custom assessments, one-way video interviews, and pre-screening tools, and uses AI 'agents' to auto-score open-text and video answers. The company raised roughly $9M in seed funding (Insight Partners, StageOne Ventures) and integrates with 40+ ATS platforms. Its market positioning is objective, skills-based screening that reduces resume bias, backed by an in-house PhD-level psychometrics team.
Regulatory exposure
Because Canditech scores and ranks candidates to inform hiring decisions, deployments function as an Automated Employment Decision Tool: New York City employers using it face Local Law 144 bias-audit and notice obligations, and EU deployers face the AI Act's high-risk employment-system requirements. Canditech's public compliance posture is almost entirely security- and privacy-centric (ISO/IEC 27001:2013, GDPR, a DPA, AES-256/TLS 1.3, AWS EU hosting). It publishes no NYC LL 144 bias audit, no independent fairness audit, no EU AI Act or FRIA deployer guidance, no model/system cards, and no ISO 42001. Partial mitigations exist in product copy: an explicit human override before decisions, and video AI scoring that analyzes only the transcript (excluding accent, tone, and appearance).
Path to a higher score
The fastest gains would come from commissioning and publicly posting an independent NYC LL 144 bias audit (ideally two consecutive years) and adding EU AI Act deployer guidance plus a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment template. On the technical-documentation axis, Canditech should publish an AI/model card or system-documentation pack with an explainability statement, disclose whether customer data trains its models, and pursue ISO 42001. A public status/uptime page, a documented vulnerability-disclosure channel, and a model-update changelog would lift post-market-monitoring transparency from its current internal-only description.
§ Regulatory frame
What applies to assessment ai.
Assessment is the most-regulated surface in AI hiring. NYC LL 144, EEOC and OFCCP frameworks, Illinois HB 3773, and EU AI Act Annex III §4 all apply, with overlap on bias-audit obligations.
§ Compare
Build any comparison→Canditech against its nearest-scoring peers.
In Assessment AI.
§ Others rated in Assessment AI
All assessment vendors→Ranked 44 of 49 by weighted total under rubric v1.0. The ordering is arithmetic on the rubric and carries no view on which tool suits a given hiring process.
- 41Zoho Recruit42F
- 42Willo41F
- 43Pillar40F
- 44CanditechThis profile39F
- 45DevSkiller39F
- 46impress.ai38F
Conflicts of interest
No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework - the consulting firm that operates this directory - provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.
Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.