Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Canditech vs DevSkiller
Canditech
Canditech is a skills-assessment and job-simulation platform that screens candidates with work-sample tests, technical and soft-skill assessments, and one-way video interviews, using AI agents to auto-score open-text and video responses.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
DevSkiller
DevSkiller (now branded SkillPanel) provides technical skills assessment and coding tests that automatically score developer candidates on real-world work-sample tasks using hidden verification unit tests and static code analysis.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
Canditech and DevSkiller tie at 39.
Canditech and DevSkiller, both in the Assessment cohort, tie at 39 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Canditech leads 3 of the 7 criteria and DevSkiller 2, with 2 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. Post-Market Monitoring is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Canditech 32, DevSkiller 40 — and at a 12% weight it carries 80% of the weighted advantage DevSkiller holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Canditech3
- DevSkiller2
- Level2
- Widest raw gap
- Post-Market Monitoring32 vs 40
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Post-Market Monitoring12% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Canditech and DevSkiller are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Canditech | DevSkiller |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | IL | PL |
| Founded | 2019 | 2014 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight33% of the movement so far
Canditech32DevSkiller401.0 weighted points to DevSkiller
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight59% of the movement so far
Canditech30DevSkiller250.8 weighted points to Canditech
- 3
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight78% of the movement so far
Canditech25DevSkiller220.5 weighted points to Canditech
- 4
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight92% of the movement so far
Canditech37DevSkiller350.4 weighted points to Canditech
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Canditech53DevSkiller550.2 weighted points to DevSkiller
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +0.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 2.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.5.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Canditech minus DevSkiller, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Canditech | DevSkiller | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 37 | 35 | +2 | +0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 22 | +3 | +0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 52 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 53 | 55 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 32 | 40 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 58 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 39F | 39F | - | +0.5 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Canditech | DevSkiller | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 11 | 4 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
Canditech has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; DevSkiller has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for DevSkiller sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 33 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Canditech, across 1 distinct source domain, and 15 for DevSkiller, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Canditech last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- DevSkiller last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.