§ The result
Cappfinity leads Emi on all 7 criteria.
Cappfinity scores 40 and Emi 33 under rubric v1.0, a 7-point gap across the Assessment and Screening cohorts. Cappfinity is ahead of Emi on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being FRIA Support at Cappfinity 28 to Emi 25. The advantage Cappfinity holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Cappfinity 28, Emi 18, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 26% of the weighted points Cappfinity gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Cappfinity
Cappfinity sells strengths-, skills- and cognitive-reasoning assessments, task-based job simulations, a digital assessment centre and an asynchronous video interview platform with optional AI-assisted scoring, and is used mainly for graduate and early-careers hiring.
Vendor profile
Emi
Emi runs AI agents on WhatsApp, SMS and Messenger that screen and score frontline job applicants against employer-set criteria, schedule interviews, and collect hiring documents and check them against Mexican government databases.
§ The record
Cappfinity is filed under Assessment AI, Emi under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Cappfinity is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Cappfinity | Emi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | AR |
| Founded | 2005 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 26% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Cappfinity 28 · Emi 18
1.8 weighted points to Cappfinity
20% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Cappfinity 36 · Emi 28
1.6 weighted points to Cappfinity
15% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Cappfinity 52 · Emi 44
1.2 weighted points to Cappfinity
12% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Cappfinity 52 · Emi 44
1.0 weighted points to Cappfinity
8% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Cappfinity 56 · Emi 48
0.6 weighted points to Cappfinity
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Cappfinity 28 · Emi 25
0.4 weighted points to Cappfinity
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Cappfinity 38 · Emi 35
0.4 weighted points to Cappfinity
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +7.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +7 beside that +7.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cappfinity minus Emi.
| Category | Weight | Cappfinity | Emi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 36 | 28 | +8 | +1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 28 | 18 | +10 | +1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 25 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 44 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 44 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 35 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 56 | 48 | +8 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 40 (F) | 33 (F) | +7 | +7.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cappfinity | Emi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 19 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Cappfinity has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Emi has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cappfinity and Emi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 62 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 36 for Cappfinity, across 6 distinct source domains, and 26 for Emi, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cappfinity last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Emi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next