§ The result
Greenhouse leads Cappfinity on all 7 criteria.
Greenhouse (ATS-integrated) and Cappfinity (Assessment) are 27 points apart under rubric v1.0, 67 (D) for Greenhouse against 40 (F) for Cappfinity. Cappfinity leads none of the 7 criteria, and Greenhouse is ahead on 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Cappfinity 28, Greenhouse 86, 18% weight), is only 38% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Cappfinity
Cappfinity sells strengths-, skills- and cognitive-reasoning assessments, task-based job simulations, a digital assessment centre and an asynchronous video interview platform with optional AI-assisted scoring, and is used mainly for graduate and early-careers hiring.
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
§ The record
Cappfinity is filed under Assessment AI, Greenhouse under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Cappfinity is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Cappfinity | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2005 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Cappfinity 28 · Greenhouse 86
10.4 weighted points to Greenhouse
20% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Cappfinity 36 · Greenhouse 78
8.4 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Cappfinity 38 · Greenhouse 58
2.4 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Cappfinity 28 · Greenhouse 42
2.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Cappfinity 52 · Greenhouse 64
1.8 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Cappfinity 52 · Greenhouse 66
1.7 weighted points to Greenhouse
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Cappfinity 56 · Greenhouse 64
0.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -27.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 27.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -27 beside that -27.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cappfinity minus Greenhouse.
| Category | Weight | Cappfinity | Greenhouse | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 36 | 78 | -42 | -8.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 28 | 86 | -58 | -10.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 42 | -14 | -2.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 64 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 66 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 58 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 56 | 64 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 40 (F) | 67 (D) | -27 | -27.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cappfinity | Greenhouse | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Cappfinity has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for Cappfinity and Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 36 for Cappfinity, across 6 distinct source domains, and 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cappfinity last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next