§ The result
Maki People leads Cappfinity on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Maki People scores 67 (D) to 40 (F) for Cappfinity, a 27-point gap between two Assessment entries. Maki People leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Cappfinity leads none. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Cappfinity 28, Maki People 80, 18% weight), is only 35% of the weighted advantage Maki People builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Cappfinity
Cappfinity sells strengths-, skills- and cognitive-reasoning assessments, task-based job simulations, a digital assessment centre and an asynchronous video interview platform with optional AI-assisted scoring, and is used mainly for graduate and early-careers hiring.
Vendor profile
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
§ The record
Cappfinity and Maki People are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Cappfinity | Maki People |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | FR |
| Founded | 2005 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Cappfinity 28 · Maki People 80
9.4 weighted points to Maki People
20% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Cappfinity 36 · Maki People 64
5.6 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 74% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Cappfinity 28 · Maki People 62
5.1 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Cappfinity 38 · Maki People 55
2.0 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Cappfinity 52 · Maki People 64
1.8 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Cappfinity 52 · Maki People 66
1.7 weighted points to Maki People
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Cappfinity 56 · Maki People 74
1.4 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -27.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 27.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -27 beside that -27.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cappfinity minus Maki People.
| Category | Weight | Cappfinity | Maki People | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 36 | 64 | -28 | -5.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 28 | 80 | -52 | -9.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 62 | -34 | -5.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 64 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 66 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 55 | -17 | -2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 56 | 74 | -18 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 40 (F) | 67 (D) | -27 | -27.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cappfinity | Maki People | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 25 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Cappfinity has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Maki People has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cappfinity and Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 67 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 36 for Cappfinity, across 6 distinct source domains, and 31 for Maki People, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cappfinity last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Maki People last reviewed
- September 8, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next