§ The result
Equalture leads Ceipal on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Equalture scores 44 and Ceipal 35 under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. Equalture leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Ceipal is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Equalture leads is Human Oversight Design, Ceipal 46 to Equalture 50. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Ceipal 20, Equalture 40, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 37% of the weighted advantage Equalture holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Ceipal
AI-powered applicant tracking and workforce-management platform for staffing firms that sources, matches, and ranks candidates on a 1-to-100 scale against job requirements.
Vendor profile
Equalture
Equalture is a game-based pre-employment assessment platform whose short browser games measure candidates' cognitive abilities and behavioural tendencies and convert them into a Fit Score ranked against an employer-specific "Success Profile" derived from that employer's own top performers.
§ The record
Ceipal is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Equalture under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Equalture is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Ceipal | Equalture |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | High |
| Headquarters | US | NL |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 37% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Ceipal 20 · Equalture 40
3.6 weighted points to Equalture
20% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Ceipal 30 · Equalture 45
3.0 weighted points to Equalture
15% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Ceipal 46 · Equalture 55
1.3 weighted points to Equalture
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Ceipal 25 · Equalture 30
0.8 weighted points to Equalture
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Ceipal 53 · Equalture 60
0.6 weighted points to Equalture
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Ceipal 46 · Equalture 50
0.5 weighted points to Equalture
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -9.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -9.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Ceipal minus Equalture.
| Category | Weight | Ceipal | Equalture | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 45 | -15 | -3.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 40 | -20 | -3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 46 | 55 | -9 | -1.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 46 | 50 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 38 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 53 | 60 | -7 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 35 (F) | 44 (F) | -9 | -9.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Ceipal | Equalture | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 19 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Ceipal has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Equalture has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Ceipal, across 1 distinct source domain, and 26 for Equalture, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Ceipal last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Equalture last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next