§ The result
Ceipal leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Inside the ATS-integrated cohort, rubric v1.0 puts Ceipal on 35 and JobDiva on 29, 6 points apart. Ceipal is ahead of JobDiva on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Article 11 Technical Documentation at Ceipal 30 to JobDiva 28. Customer Documentation is the widest raw gap (Ceipal 53, JobDiva 42) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Data Governance Disclosure at 15% (Ceipal 46, JobDiva 38), 22% of the weighted advantage Ceipal builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Ceipal
AI-powered applicant tracking and workforce-management platform for staffing firms that sources, matches, and ranks candidates on a 1-to-100 scale against job requirements.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
§ The record
Ceipal and JobDiva are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Ceipal | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2003 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 22% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Ceipal 46 · JobDiva 38
1.2 weighted points to Ceipal
12% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Ceipal 38 · JobDiva 30
1.0 weighted points to Ceipal
18% weight · 56% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Ceipal 20 · JobDiva 15
0.9 weighted points to Ceipal
8% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Ceipal 53 · JobDiva 42
0.9 weighted points to Ceipal
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Ceipal 46 · JobDiva 40
0.7 weighted points to Ceipal
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Ceipal 25 · JobDiva 22
0.4 weighted points to Ceipal
20% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Ceipal 30 · JobDiva 28
0.4 weighted points to Ceipal
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +5.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +6 beside that +5.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Ceipal minus JobDiva.
| Category | Weight | Ceipal | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 28 | +2 | +0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 15 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 22 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 46 | 38 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 46 | 40 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 30 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 53 | 42 | +11 | +0.9 |
| Total | 100% | 35 (F) | 29 (F) | +6 | +5.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Ceipal | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Ceipal has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Ceipal, across 1 distinct source domain, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Ceipal last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next