§ The result
1 point separates Coderbyte and Cezanne Recruitment.
Coderbyte holds a 1-point edge over Cezanne Recruitment under rubric v1.0, 42 to 41, across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of Coderbyte: Coderbyte is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Cezanne Recruitment on Bias Audit Transparency. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: FRIA Support (Cezanne Recruitment 28, Coderbyte 33) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Cezanne Recruitment 40, Coderbyte 44), the second being 37% of the weighted advantage Coderbyte holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Cezanne Recruitment
Cezanne Recruitment (formerly Occupop) is an applicant tracking system for SMEs that handles job posting, candidate management and interview scheduling. In its Recruitment PLUS+ tier it uses AI to score each CV from 0 to 100 against the job description, alongside weighted screening-question scores, knockout filters and optional AI anonymisation of CVs for hiring-manager review.
Vendor profile
Coderbyte
Coderbyte is a technical hiring platform offering coding assessments with automated and AI grading of challenges and take-home projects, live coding interviews, and AI screening that grades resumes against job-description criteria and runs agentic phone screens.
§ The record
Cezanne Recruitment is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Coderbyte under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Coderbyte is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Cezanne Recruitment | Coderbyte |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 24% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 40 · Coderbyte 44
0.8 weighted points to Coderbyte
15% weight · 46% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Cezanne Recruitment 28 · Coderbyte 33
0.8 weighted points to Coderbyte
18% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Cezanne Recruitment 24 · Coderbyte 20
0.7 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
12% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Cezanne Recruitment 44 · Coderbyte 40
0.5 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Cezanne Recruitment 54 · Coderbyte 56
0.3 weighted points to Coderbyte
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Cezanne Recruitment 58 · Coderbyte 60
0.2 weighted points to Coderbyte
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 57 · Coderbyte 58
0.1 weighted points to Coderbyte
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -1.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus Coderbyte.
| Category | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Coderbyte | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 44 | -4 | -0.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 24 | 20 | +4 | +0.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 33 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 56 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 60 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 40 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 58 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 42 (F) | -1 | -1.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Coderbyte | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Coderbyte has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Coderbyte sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 62 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 31 for Coderbyte, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Coderbyte last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next