§ The result
Codility leads Cezanne Recruitment on all 7 criteria.
Codility, filed under Assessment, comes out 13 points above Cezanne Recruitment, filed under ATS-integrated: 54 against 41 under rubric v1.0. Codility takes all 7 criteria and Cezanne Recruitment none of them; the nearest contest is Data Governance Disclosure, Cezanne Recruitment 54 to Codility 57. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Bias Audit Transparency (Cezanne Recruitment 24, Codility 45) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Cezanne Recruitment 40, Codility 60), the second being 33% of the weighted advantage Codility holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Cezanne Recruitment
Cezanne Recruitment (formerly Occupop) is an applicant tracking system for SMEs that handles job posting, candidate management and interview scheduling. In its Recruitment PLUS+ tier it uses AI to score each CV from 0 to 100 against the job description, alongside weighted screening-question scores, knockout filters and optional AI anonymisation of CVs for hiring-manager review.
Vendor profile
Codility
Codility is a technical/coding assessment platform that screens and interviews software engineers with work-sample coding tests, live technical interviews, and integrity tooling including plagiarism and AI-use detection.
§ The record
Cezanne Recruitment is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Codility under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Codility is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Cezanne Recruitment | Codility |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | High |
| Headquarters | GB | GB |
| Founded | 2012 | 2009 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 40 · Codility 60
4.0 weighted points to Codility
18% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Cezanne Recruitment 24 · Codility 45
3.8 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Cezanne Recruitment 28 · Codility 42
2.1 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Cezanne Recruitment 44 · Codility 50
0.7 weighted points to Codility
8% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 57 · Codility 66
0.7 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Cezanne Recruitment 58 · Codility 62
0.5 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Cezanne Recruitment 54 · Codility 57
0.4 weighted points to Codility
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -12.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -12.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus Codility.
| Category | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Codility | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 60 | -20 | -4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 24 | 45 | -21 | -3.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 42 | -14 | -2.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 57 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 62 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 50 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 66 | -9 | -0.7 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 54 (F) | -13 | -12.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Codility | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 16 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Codility has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 20 for Codility, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Codility last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next