HomeCompareCezanne Recruitment vs Entelo

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Cezanne Recruitment vs Entelo

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Cezanne Recruitment leads Entelo on all 7 criteria.

Under rubric v1.0, Cezanne Recruitment, filed under ATS-integrated, finishes on 41 and Entelo, filed under Sourcing, on 33, 8 points apart. Cezanne Recruitment takes all 7 criteria from Entelo without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is FRIA Support, Cezanne Recruitment 28 to Entelo 25. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (Cezanne Recruitment 57, Entelo 40) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Cezanne Recruitment 40, Entelo 30), the second being 23% of the weighted advantage Cezanne Recruitment holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Cezanne Recruitment is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Entelo under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordCezanne RecruitmentEntelo
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersGBUS
Founded20122011

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 23% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Cezanne Recruitment 40 · Entelo 30

    2.0 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  2. 12% weight · 44% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Cezanne Recruitment 58 · Entelo 42

    1.9 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  3. 8% weight · 59% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Cezanne Recruitment 57 · Entelo 40

    1.4 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  4. 15% weight · 75% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Cezanne Recruitment 54 · Entelo 45

    1.3 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  5. 12% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Cezanne Recruitment 44 · Entelo 35

    1.1 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  6. 18% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Cezanne Recruitment 24 · Entelo 20

    0.7 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Cezanne Recruitment 28 · Entelo 25

    0.4 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +8.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +8 beside that +8.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus Entelo.

CategoryWeightCezanne RecruitmentEnteloΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4030+10+2.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2420+4+0.7
FRIA Support15%2825+3+0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5445+9+1.3
Human Oversight Design12%5842+16+1.9
Post-Market Monitoring12%4435+9+1.1
Customer Documentation8%5740+17+1.4
Total100%41 (F)33 (F)+8+8.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCezanne RecruitmentEntelo
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain22—
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%256Sources on the vendor's own domain98Sources on the vendor's own domain

Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Entelo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.