Entelo

Entelo is an AI-powered talent sourcing and diversity-recruiting platform that aggregates hundreds of millions of public candidate profiles and applies predictive machine-learning models to score, rank, and surface (including underrepresented) candidates for recruiters.

HireAIScore rates Entelo 33 out of 100 (grade F, Substantial gaps) under rubric v1.0, last reviewed June 7, 2026. Entelo ranks 80 of 86 vendors rated in Candidate sourcing AI, against a category average of 46. That score is drawn from 16 evidence items across 7 rubric criteria for Entelo — 9 with a cited source, 8 recording that nothing was located.

Score breakdown

Entelo, criterion by criterion

Each rubric criterion is scored out of 100 on the cited evidence, then weighted into the total.

Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.

  1. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Weight 20% · avg 48

    30

    +6.0

  2. Bias Audit Transparency

    Weight 18% · avg 40

    20

    +3.6

  3. FRIA Support

    Weight 15% · avg 31

    25

    +3.8

  4. Data Governance Disclosure

    Weight 15% · avg 53

    45

    +6.8

  5. Human Oversight Design

    Weight 12% · avg 56

    42

    +5.0

  6. Post-Market Monitoring

    Weight 12% · avg 40

    35

    +4.2

  7. Customer Documentation

    Weight 8% · avg 57

    40

    +3.2

Total weighted score

32.5(rounded to 33 for display)

Category avg is the mean raw score on that criterion across the 86 Candidate sourcing AI vendors in scope of this rubric, this one included.

Strongest criterion

Data Governance Disclosure

45raw / 100

Contributes 6.8 to the total. 45 against a 53 category average.

Weakest criterion

Bias Audit Transparency

20raw / 100

Contributes 3.6 to the total. 20 against a 40 category average.

Cited evidence

The evidence behind the score

Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence. Open a criterion to see what was found, when, and where.

Download diligence record

Evidence ledger

Items
16
Documentation
5
Public statement
3
Absence
8
With a source URL
9 of 16
Source hostnames
4
Fewest items
1
FRIA Support

These figures measure how thoroughly Entelo was reviewed, not how Entelo performed — an absence row, recording that nothing was located, is counted like any other item.

Article 11 Technical Documentation

2 items
30

Bias Audit Transparency

3 items
20

FRIA Support

1 item
25
  • AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    No FRIA template, Article 27 deployer guidance, or EU AI Act high-risk deployer documentation was found on rival-hr.com, the security/privacy page, or via search for Entelo/Rival.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

Data Governance Disclosure

2 items
45
  • DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    Security & Privacy page states annual SOC 2 audits, references the ISO 27000 family and NIST/CIS, EU-U.S./UK/Swiss Data Privacy Framework participation, and GDPR processor compliance.

    https://rival-hr.com/security-privacy/

  • AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    No disclosure of what data trains the predictive scoring models, no exclusion lists, and no AI-specific data-governance statement; sourcing aggregates ~500M+ public profiles with no documented lawful-basis or candidate opt-out for EU data.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

Human Oversight Design

2 items
42
  • Public statementCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    Diversity product is recruiter-operated: users select diversity filters and an 'Unbiased mode' before searching, implying a human-in-control sourcing workflow rather than automated decisions.

    https://rival-hr.com/diversity

  • AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    No documented human-override mechanism, in-interface explanation of AI scores, per-jurisdiction compliance toggles, or audit-logging was found on the product or compliance pages.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

Post-Market Monitoring

3 items
35
  • DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    Public Rival status page shows per-service availability, 90-day uptime history, and email/SMS/Slack/Teams/webhook/RSS incident subscriptions.

    https://status.rival-hr.com/

  • DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    Security page references monthly vulnerability scans and annual penetration testing, but covers infrastructure security rather than AI model performance or bias monitoring.

    https://rival-hr.com/security-privacy/

  • AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    No AI model-update changelog, AI/bias incident-reporting channel, or continuous fairness-monitoring dashboard was found.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

Customer Documentation

3 items
40
  • DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    Entelo/Rival product landing page describes the sourcing/ATS platform and links to Security & Privacy, Privacy Policy, Terms, and Status pages.

    https://rival-hr.com/entelo-recruit/

  • DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    Public diversity product page documents one-click diversity filters, unbiased mode, and inclusive-language alerts.

    https://rival-hr.com/diversity

  • AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    No deployer/compliance guidance, NYC LL 144 candidate-notice templates, EU AI Act guidance, FAQ on AEDT obligations, or publicly posted DPA was found.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

Editorial notes

Company overview

Entelo, founded in 2011 by Jon Bischke and John McGrath and headquartered in San Francisco, is an AI talent-sourcing and diversity-recruiting platform that mines public web and social profiles, applies predictive 'recruitability' scoring, and offers diversity filters (gender, race, ethnicity, veteran status) plus an 'Unbiased Sourcing Mode' that anonymizes bias-prone profile attributes. Its assets were acquired by SilkRoad Technology in 2022 and rebranded under Rival; the entelo.com domain now redirects to rival-hr.com and the product is marketed as Rival Recruit with a 700M+ passive-candidate database. Pricing is undisclosed but positioned mid-market/enterprise for talent-acquisition teams.

Regulatory exposure

Entelo/Rival sits squarely in the EU AI Act high-risk band: AI candidate scoring and ranking for recruitment is Annex III high-risk, and its predictive 'likelihood to move' and demographic diversity filtering raise both bias and data-provenance questions under NYC LL 144, Illinois, and Colorado SB 205. Because the tool ranks and scores candidates, it can meet the AEDT definition under NYC LL 144, yet no public bias-audit summary exists (Entelo/Rival does not appear in the ACLU's LL 144 tracker). The diversity product explicitly infers race/ethnicity/gender, heightening data-governance and disparate-impact scrutiny, while sourcing from aggregated public profiles raises GDPR lawful-basis concerns for EU candidates.

Path to a higher score

Entelo/Rival could materially raise its score by commissioning and publicly posting an independent NYC LL 144 bias audit (BABL AI, Holistic AI, Warden AI, etc.) with auditor and date, and publishing a model/system card or AI policy describing how its scoring and unbiased-mode features work. Concrete wins: an explicit deployer-facing compliance pack (LL 144 notice templates, EU AI Act Article 27 FRIA guidance, DPAs), a documented data-exclusion and training-data statement, ISO 42001 certification, and in-product explainability plus documented human-override/audit-log controls. Surfacing a security/AI-incident contact and an AI changelog would lift post-market-monitoring evidence beyond the current generic status page.

Regulatory frame

What applies to candidate sourcing AI.

Ranking outputs are inside Annex III §4 when they influence hiring decisions. GDPR Article 22 (automated decision-making) and the GDPR rights around profiling apply independently for EU candidates.

Compare

Entelo against its nearest-scoring peers.

The closest scores in Candidate sourcing AI, side by side.

Build any comparison

Ranking

Others rated in Candidate sourcing AI

Ranked 80 of 86 by weighted total under rubric v1.0. The ordering is arithmetic on the rubric and carries no view on which tool suits a given hiring process.

  1. #77SeekOut34F
  2. #78HireQuotient34F
  3. #79Qureos33F
  4. #80EnteloThis profile33F
  5. #81Emi33F
  6. #82Arena Analytics32F
All sourcing vendors

Conflicts of interest

No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework - the consulting firm that operates this directory - provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.

Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.