The result

1 point separates SeekOut and Entelo.

Within the Sourcing cohort, SeekOut edges Entelo by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 34 to 33. Entelo and SeekOut each lead 3 of the 7 criteria, with 1 level, though the side of the split SeekOut holds (headed by Bias Audit Transparency) adds up to more weighted points. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Entelo 20, SeekOut 40) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 73% of the weighted advantage SeekOut holds across the 3 criteria it leads.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • Entelo3
  • SeekOut3
  • Level1
Widest raw gap
Bias Audit Transparency20 vs 40
Heaviest weighted swing
Bias Audit Transparency18% weight

Keep this comparison

Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.

Sent once, with links to turn on alerts for either vendor. No list.

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

Entelo and SeekOut are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

RecordEnteloSeekOut
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20112017

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Bias Audit Transparency

    18% weight45% of the movement so far

    Entelo20
    SeekOut40

    3.6 weighted points to SeekOut

  2. Data Governance Disclosure

    15% weight63% of the movement so far

    Entelo45
    SeekOut35

    1.5 weighted points to Entelo

  3. Post-Market Monitoring

    12% weight78% of the movement so far

    Entelo35
    SeekOut25

    1.2 weighted points to Entelo

  4. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    20% weight91% of the movement so far

    Entelo30
    SeekOut35

    1.0 weighted points to SeekOut

  5. Customer Documentation

    8% weight96% of the movement so far

    Entelo40
    SeekOut35

    0.4 weighted points to Entelo

  6. Human Oversight Design

    12% weight100% of the movement so far

    Entelo42
    SeekOut45

    0.4 weighted points to SeekOut

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -1.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.9.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Entelo minus SeekOut, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightEnteloSeekOutΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3035-5-1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2040-20-3.6
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%4535+10+1.5
Human Oversight Design12%4245-3-0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%3525+10+1.2
Customer Documentation8%4035+5+0.4
Total100%33F34F-1-1.9

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEnteloSeekOut
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11—11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%22—11—
FRIA Support15%01—01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11—10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%98Sources on the vendor's own domain54Sources on the vendor's own domain

Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; SeekOut has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 5 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 25 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 9 for SeekOut, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Entelo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SeekOut last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next