Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Entelo vs HireQuotient
Entelo
Entelo is an AI-powered talent sourcing and diversity-recruiting platform that aggregates hundreds of millions of public candidate profiles and applies predictive machine-learning models to score, rank, and surface (including underrepresented) candidates for recruiters.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
HireQuotient
EasySource by HireQuotient is an AI recruiting platform for North American frontline employers that sources and scores candidates from LinkedIn, the open web and partner databases, verifies licences, automates outreach including AI voice calls, and adds an ATS, interview scheduling, and skills, cognitive and AI-scored video assessments.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
HireQuotient takes the total, Entelo takes more of the criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, HireQuotient and Entelo finish 1 point apart, 34 to 33, as two Sourcing entries. Entelo leads more of the criteria, 4 against 3 for HireQuotient, yet HireQuotient takes Human Oversight Design, which carries 12% of the rubric, and the weighted sum with it. Human Oversight Design is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Entelo 42, HireQuotient 57 — and at a 12% weight it carries 50% of the weighted advantage HireQuotient holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Entelo4
- HireQuotient3
- Widest raw gap
- Human Oversight Design42 vs 57
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Human Oversight Design12% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Entelo and HireQuotient are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: ATS-integrated and Screening.
Both are in scope of
Only HireQuotient is in scope of
| Record | Entelo | HireQuotient |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | 2011 | 2021 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Human Oversight Design
12% weight31% of the movement so far
Entelo42HireQuotient571.8 weighted points to HireQuotient
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight49% of the movement so far
Entelo30HireQuotient351.0 weighted points to HireQuotient
- 3
Customer Documentation
8% weight63% of the movement so far
Entelo40HireQuotient500.8 weighted points to HireQuotient
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight76% of the movement so far
Entelo45HireQuotient400.8 weighted points to Entelo
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight86% of the movement so far
Entelo35HireQuotient300.6 weighted points to Entelo
- 6
FRIA Support
15% weight94% of the movement so far
Entelo25HireQuotient220.4 weighted points to Entelo
- 7
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight100% of the movement so far
Entelo20HireQuotient180.4 weighted points to Entelo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -1.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.4.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Entelo minus HireQuotient, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Entelo | HireQuotient | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 18 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 22 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 40 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 42 | 57 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 50 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 33F | 34F | -1 | -1.4 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Entelo | HireQuotient | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 9 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Entelo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireQuotient last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
Scored against