Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Cezanne Recruitment vs Harri
Cezanne Recruitment
Cezanne Recruitment (formerly Occupop) is an applicant tracking system for SMEs that handles job posting, candidate management and interview scheduling. In its Recruitment PLUS+ tier it uses AI to score each CV from 0 to 100 against the job description, alongside weighted screening-question scores, knockout filters and optional AI anonymisation of CVs for hiring-manager review.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
Cezanne Recruitment and Harri tie at 41.
Cezanne Recruitment and Harri tie at 41 under rubric v1.0 inside the ATS-integrated cohort, arriving there from different criteria. Cezanne Recruitment leads 5 of the 7 criteria and Harri 2, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, FRIA Support, is both the widest raw gap (Cezanne Recruitment 28, Harri 44) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 15% weight it makes up 91% of the weighted advantage Harri holds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Cezanne Recruitment5
- Harri2
- Widest raw gap
- FRIA Support28 vs 44
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Cezanne Recruitment and Harri are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Cezanne Recruitment | Harri |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight44% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment28Harri442.4 weighted points to Harri
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight62% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment40Harri351.0 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight75% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment58Harri520.7 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight84% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment44Harri400.5 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
- 5
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight90% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment24Harri220.4 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight96% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment54Harri520.3 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment57Harri600.2 weighted points to Harri
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.2.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus Harri, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Harri | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 35 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 24 | 22 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 44 | -16 | -2.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 52 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 52 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 40 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 60 | -3 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 41F | - | +0.2 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Harri | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.