§ The result
HireVue leads Cezanne Recruitment by 17 points.
HireVue finishes 17 points clear of Cezanne Recruitment under rubric v1.0 — 58 against 41 — across the Video interview and ATS-integrated cohorts. HireVue leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Cezanne Recruitment leads 1, including Customer Documentation. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Cezanne Recruitment 24, HireVue 80) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 61% of the weighted advantage HireVue holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Cezanne Recruitment
Cezanne Recruitment (formerly Occupop) is an applicant tracking system for SMEs that handles job posting, candidate management and interview scheduling. In its Recruitment PLUS+ tier it uses AI to score each CV from 0 to 100 against the job description, alongside weighted screening-question scores, knockout filters and optional AI anonymisation of CVs for hiring-manager review.
Vendor profile
HireVue
Asynchronous video interviewing platform with optional AI-driven assessment scoring of candidate responses.
§ The record
Cezanne Recruitment is filed under ATS-integrated AI, HireVue under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only HireVue is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Cezanne Recruitment | HireVue |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2004 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Cezanne Recruitment 24 · HireVue 80
10.1 weighted points to HireVue
20% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 40 · HireVue 65
5.0 weighted points to HireVue
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Cezanne Recruitment 28 · HireVue 35
1.1 weighted points to HireVue
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Cezanne Recruitment 58 · HireVue 60
0.2 weighted points to HireVue
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 57 · HireVue 55
0.2 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Cezanne Recruitment 54 · HireVue 55
0.1 weighted points to HireVue
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Cezanne Recruitment 44 · HireVue 45
0.1 weighted points to HireVue
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -16.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -17 beside that -16.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus HireVue.
| Category | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | HireVue | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 65 | -25 | -5.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 24 | 80 | -56 | -10.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 35 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 55 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 60 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 45 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 55 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 58 (F) | -17 | -16.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | HireVue | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; HireVue has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HireVue sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 15 for HireVue, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireVue last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.