§ The result
Cezanne Recruitment leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Cezanne Recruitment sits 10 points above Intervue.io under rubric v1.0 — 41 against 31 — with Cezanne Recruitment filed under ATS-integrated and Intervue.io under Video interview. Cezanne Recruitment is ahead of Intervue.io on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Human Oversight Design at Cezanne Recruitment 58 to Intervue.io 54. Data Governance Disclosure is the widest raw gap (Cezanne Recruitment 54, Intervue.io 38) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Cezanne Recruitment 40, Intervue.io 28), 23% of the weighted advantage Cezanne Recruitment builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Cezanne Recruitment
Cezanne Recruitment (formerly Occupop) is an applicant tracking system for SMEs that handles job posting, candidate management and interview scheduling. In its Recruitment PLUS+ tier it uses AI to score each CV from 0 to 100 against the job description, alongside weighted screening-question scores, knockout filters and optional AI anonymisation of CVs for hiring-manager review.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
§ The record
Cezanne Recruitment is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Intervue.io under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Intervue.io is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Cezanne Recruitment | Intervue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | IN |
| Founded | 2012 | 2020 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 23% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 40 · Intervue.io 28
2.4 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
15% weight · 45% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Cezanne Recruitment 54 · Intervue.io 38
2.4 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
18% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Cezanne Recruitment 24 · Intervue.io 12
2.2 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
12% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Cezanne Recruitment 44 · Intervue.io 30
1.7 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Cezanne Recruitment 28 · Intervue.io 22
0.9 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 57 · Intervue.io 50
0.6 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Cezanne Recruitment 58 · Intervue.io 54
0.5 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +10.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +10.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus Intervue.io.
| Category | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Intervue.io | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 28 | +12 | +2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 24 | 12 | +12 | +2.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 22 | +6 | +0.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 38 | +16 | +2.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 54 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 30 | +14 | +1.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 50 | +7 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 31 (F) | +10 | +10.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Intervue.io | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 68 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.