HomeCompareCezanne Recruitment vs myInterview

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Cezanne Recruitment vs myInterview

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

4 points separate Cezanne Recruitment and myInterview.

Cezanne Recruitment holds a 4-point edge over myInterview under rubric v1.0, 41 to 37, across the ATS-integrated and Video interview cohorts. myInterview takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 6 for Cezanne Recruitment, whose share includes Data Governance Disclosure. The heaviest weighted swing runs the other way — myInterview takes Bias Audit Transparency at 18%, Cezanne Recruitment 24 to myInterview 35, 100% of the weighted advantage myInterview holds — while the widest raw gap sits on Customer Documentation, Cezanne Recruitment 57 to myInterview 40.

§ The record

Cezanne Recruitment is filed under ATS-integrated AI, myInterview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only myInterview is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCezanne RecruitmentmyInterview
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersGBAU
Founded20122014

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 23% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Cezanne Recruitment 24 · myInterview 35

    2.0 weighted points to myInterview

  2. 15% weight · 44% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Cezanne Recruitment 54 · myInterview 42

    1.8 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  3. 8% weight · 60% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Cezanne Recruitment 57 · myInterview 40

    1.4 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  4. 12% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Cezanne Recruitment 44 · myInterview 33

    1.3 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  5. 12% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Cezanne Recruitment 58 · myInterview 48

    1.2 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  6. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Cezanne Recruitment 28 · myInterview 25

    0.4 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  7. 20% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Cezanne Recruitment 40 · myInterview 38

    0.4 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +4.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +4.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus myInterview.

CategoryWeightCezanne RecruitmentmyInterviewΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4038+2+0.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%2435-11-2.0
FRIA Support15%2825+3+0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5442+12+1.8
Human Oversight Design12%5848+10+1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4433+11+1.3
Customer Documentation8%5740+17+1.4
Total100%41 (F)37 (F)+4+4.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCezanne RecruitmentmyInterview
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on a separate domain
All criteria100%256Sources on the vendor's own domain76Sources on a separate domain

Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
myInterview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.