myInterview

myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
Video interviewScreeningScheduling

HireAIScore rates myInterview 37 out of 100 (grade F, Substantial gaps) under rubric v1.0, last reviewed June 7, 2026. myInterview ranks 47 of 57 vendors rated in Video interview AI, against a category average of 44. That score is drawn from 13 evidence items across 7 rubric criteria for myInterview — 7 with a cited source, 6 recording that nothing was located.

Score breakdown

myInterview, criterion by criterion

Each rubric criterion is scored out of 100 on the cited evidence, then weighted into the total.

Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.

  1. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Weight 20% · avg 46

    38

    +7.6

  2. Bias Audit Transparency

    Weight 18% · avg 38

    35

    +6.3

  3. FRIA Support

    Weight 15% · avg 30

    25

    +3.8

  4. Data Governance Disclosure

    Weight 15% · avg 51

    42

    +6.3

  5. Human Oversight Design

    Weight 12% · avg 56

    48

    +5.8

  6. Post-Market Monitoring

    Weight 12% · avg 37

    33

    +4.0

  7. Customer Documentation

    Weight 8% · avg 56

    40

    +3.2

Total weighted score

36.9(rounded to 37 for display)

Category avg is the mean raw score on that criterion across the 57 Video interview AI vendors in scope of this rubric, this one included.

Strongest criterion

Human Oversight Design

48raw / 100

Contributes 5.8 to the total. 48 against a 56 category average.

Weakest criterion

FRIA Support

25raw / 100

Contributes 3.8 to the total. 25 against a 30 category average.

Cited evidence

The evidence behind the score

Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence. Open a criterion to see what was found, when, and where.

Download diligence record

Evidence ledger

Items
13
Documentation
3
Public statement
4
Absence
6
With a source URL
7 of 13
Source hostnames
2
Fewest items
1
FRIA Support

These figures measure how thoroughly myInterview was reviewed, not how myInterview performed — an absence row, recording that nothing was located, is counted like any other item.

Article 11 Technical Documentation

2 items38
  • Public statementCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    Radancy's Responsible AI page (now governing myInterview) states a commitment to 'fairness in our models' and 'tools for transparency in results' but provides no model cards, explainability statements, or technical documentation.

    https://www.radancy.com/en/responsible-ai/

  • AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    No system/model card, Article 11-style technical documentation, explainability statement, or ISO 42001 certification was found; the former myinterview.com/product-intelligence and /ai-policy pages now redirect to Radancy or return 404.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

Bias Audit Transparency

2 items35

FRIA Support

1 item25
  • AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    No EU AI Act Article 27 Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment template or deployer-obligation guidance was found on myInterview's or Radancy's sites or anywhere public.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

Data Governance Disclosure

2 items42
  • DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    Radancy's security page (governing acquired myInterview) cites SOC 2 Type 2, HITRUST, NIST 800-171 and CSA and a GDPR-alignment statement, but no ISO 27001/42001 or AI-specific data-governance detail.

    https://www.radancy.com/en/security/

  • Public statementCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    Responsible AI page states the company will 'never train AI models with personal data,' the closest public data-exclusion commitment, but without a detailed training-data or exclusion-list disclosure.

    https://www.radancy.com/en/responsible-ai/

Human Oversight Design

2 items48

Post-Market Monitoring

2 items33
  • DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    Radancy's security page provides security/vulnerability reporting and certification claims but no model-update changelog or continuous monitoring dashboard.

    https://www.radancy.com/en/security/

  • AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    No public incident channel, model-update changelog, or continuous bias-monitoring dashboard for the myInterview AEDT was found.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

Customer Documentation

2 items40
  • DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    Radancy's Screening & Scheduling product page (the live destination for myinterview.com) describes AI screening, one-way video, transparent scoring and Teams integration, but contains no compliance or deployer guidance.

    https://www.radancy.com/en/screening-and-scheduling/

  • AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026

    No publicly downloadable DPA, NYC LL 144 / EU AI Act deployer guidance, or compliance FAQ was found; myinterview.com/privacy renders only as a links landing page and the Radancy DPA URL returned 404.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

Editorial notes

Company overview

myInterview is an async one-way video interview and AI screening platform founded in 2014, with roots in Tel Aviv and operating offices in Sydney, Australia and London, UK. Candidates record video answers to structured questions on their own schedule, and the platform's machine-learning 'Smart Shortlisting' and personality-insights features (based on a Big Five model) score and rank applicants for recruiters, with ATS, Workable and Microsoft Teams integrations. In September 2025 myInterview was acquired by Radancy and folded into the Radancy Talent Acquisition Cloud as its candidate/recruiter AI-agent, screening and scheduling layer; the myinterview.com marketing, product and blog pages now redirect to radancy.com.

Regulatory exposure

As an AI tool that scores and shortlists job candidates from video and transcribed speech, myInterview falls squarely within the scope of NYC Local Law 144 (AEDT), the EU AI Act's high-risk Annex III employment category, and emerging US state laws (Illinois AIVIA, Colorado AI Act). Despite this exposure, no public, source-linked NYC LL 144 bias audit by a named independent auditor could be located, no Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment template or EU AI Act deployer guidance is published, and no model card / Article 11-style technical documentation or ISO 42001 certification is available. Post-acquisition, the only live governance material is Radancy's principles-level Responsible AI page and a security page citing SOC 2 Type 2, HITRUST and NIST 800-171 - none of which addresses algorithmic bias auditing or per-jurisdiction AEDT compliance.

Path to a higher score

The clearest path to a higher score is to publish, on a stable and clearly linked page, an independent NYC LL 144 bias audit (auditor, date, intersectional disparate-impact tables) and to repeat it annually; add an AI/model card describing the Smart Shortlisting model, the Big Five basis, the data used and explicitly excluded (e.g., face, image and background), and an explainability statement; and produce EU AI Act deployer materials - a FRIA template and instructions-for-use - plus a publicly downloadable DPA and a documented post-market monitoring / incident channel. Surfacing the historical methodology and bias-mitigation claims as durable, versioned documentation (rather than redirected marketing copy) would materially raise the technical-documentation, bias-audit and customer-documentation scores.

Regulatory frame

What applies to video interview AI.

The most heavily-regulated category. NYC LL 144 has applied since 2023; EU AI Act Annex III §4 treats the assessment layer as high-risk; Mobley v. Workday is shaping vendor-liability case-law here.

Keep reading

All video interview vendorsHow this score is builtAnnex IV section-by-section: what AI hiring vendors must documentWhat makes a defensible NYC LL 144 bias audit

Compare

myInterview against its nearest-scoring peers.

The closest scores in Video interview AI, side by side.

Build any comparison

Ranking

Others rated in Video interview AI

Ranked 47 of 57 by weighted total under rubric v1.0. The ordering is arithmetic on the rubric and carries no view on which tool suits a given hiring process.

  1. #44Brazen38F
  2. #45HirePro38F
  3. #46impress.ai38F
  4. #47myInterviewThis profile37F
  5. #48micro136F
  6. #49Aon Assessment35F
All video interview vendors

Conflicts of interest

No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework - the consulting firm that operates this directory - provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.

Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.