myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
§ 01 — Score breakdown
§ Score breakdown
Category scoring
Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.
- 01
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Weight 20%38
+7.6
- 02
Bias Audit Transparency
Weight 18%35
+6.3
- 03
FRIA Support
Weight 15%25
+3.8
- 04
Data Governance Disclosure
Weight 15%42
+6.3
- 05
Human Oversight Design
Weight 12%48
+5.8
- 06
Post-Market Monitoring
Weight 12%33
+4.0
- 07
Customer Documentation
Weight 8%40
+3.2
§ 02 — Strongest · weakest
Strongest category
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Raw score 38 · contributes 7.6 to total.
Weakest category
Customer Documentation
Raw score 40 · contributes 3.2 to total.
§ 03 — Cited evidence
§ Evidence
Cited per category
Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence.
§ 04 — Editorial notes
Company overview
myInterview is an async one-way video interview and AI screening platform founded in 2014, with roots in Tel Aviv and operating offices in Sydney, Australia and London, UK. Candidates record video answers to structured questions on their own schedule, and the platform's machine-learning 'Smart Shortlisting' and personality-insights features (based on a Big Five model) score and rank applicants for recruiters, with ATS, Workable and Microsoft Teams integrations. In September 2025 myInterview was acquired by Radancy and folded into the Radancy Talent Acquisition Cloud as its candidate/recruiter AI-agent, screening and scheduling layer; the myinterview.com marketing, product and blog pages now redirect to radancy.com.
Regulatory exposure
As an AI tool that scores and shortlists job candidates from video and transcribed speech, myInterview falls squarely within the scope of NYC Local Law 144 (AEDT), the EU AI Act's high-risk Annex III employment category, and emerging US state laws (Illinois AIVIA, Colorado AI Act). Despite this exposure, no public, source-linked NYC LL 144 bias audit by a named independent auditor could be located, no Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment template or EU AI Act deployer guidance is published, and no model card / Article 11-style technical documentation or ISO 42001 certification is available. Post-acquisition, the only live governance material is Radancy's principles-level Responsible AI page and a security page citing SOC 2 Type 2, HITRUST and NIST 800-171 — none of which addresses algorithmic bias auditing or per-jurisdiction AEDT compliance.
Path to a higher score
The clearest path to a higher score is to publish, on a stable and clearly linked page, an independent NYC LL 144 bias audit (auditor, date, intersectional disparate-impact tables) and to repeat it annually; add an AI/model card describing the Smart Shortlisting model, the Big Five basis, the data used and explicitly excluded (e.g., face, image and background), and an explainability statement; and produce EU AI Act deployer materials — a FRIA template and instructions-for-use — plus a publicly downloadable DPA and a documented post-market monitoring / incident channel. Surfacing the historical methodology and bias-mitigation claims as durable, versioned documentation (rather than redirected marketing copy) would materially raise the technical-documentation, bias-audit and customer-documentation scores.
Conflicts of interest
No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework — the consulting firm that operates this directory — provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.
Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.