myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
HireAIScore rates myInterview 37 out of 100 (grade F, Substantial gaps) under rubric v1.0, last reviewed June 7, 2026. myInterview ranks 28 of 31 vendors rated in Video interview AI, against a category average of 45. That score is drawn from 13 evidence items across 7 rubric criteria for myInterview — 7 with a cited source, 6 recording that nothing was located.
§ 01 - Company facts
- Legal name
- myInterview Ltd
- Founded
- 2014
- Headquarters
- Australia · AU
- Pricing tier
- Mid
- Market side
- Employer-side (AEDT)
- Categories
- Video interviewScreeningScheduling
- Website
- myinterview.com
These are company details, not findings. They are editable by a verified representative and carry no weight in the score, which is built only from the cited evidence below.
§ 02 - Score breakdown
§ Score breakdown
Category scoring
Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.
- 01
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Weight 20%38
+7.6 · category avg 48
- 02
Bias Audit Transparency
Weight 18%35
+6.3 · category avg 41
- 03
FRIA Support
Weight 15%25
+3.8 · category avg 31
- 04
Data Governance Disclosure
Weight 15%42
+6.3 · category avg 52
- 05
Human Oversight Design
Weight 12%48
+5.8 · category avg 56
- 06
Post-Market Monitoring
Weight 12%33
+4.0 · category avg 37
- 07
Customer Documentation
Weight 8%40
+3.2 · category avg 57
Category avg is the mean raw score on that criterion across the 31 Video interview AI vendors in scope of this rubric, this one included.
§ 03 - Strongest · weakest
Strongest category
Human Oversight Design
Raw score 48 · contributes 5.8 to total.
48 against a 56 category average
Weakest category
FRIA Support
Raw score 25 · contributes 3.8 to total.
25 against a 31 category average
§ 04 - Cited evidence
Download diligence record→§ Evidence
Cited per category
Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence.
Evidence ledger
- Items
- 13
- Documentation
- 3
- Public statement
- 4
- Absence
- 6
- With a source URL
- 7 of 13
- Source hostnames
- 2
- Fewest items
- 1
- FRIA Support
These figures measure how thoroughly myInterview was reviewed, not how myInterview performed — an absence row, recording that nothing was located, is counted like any other item.
Article 11 Technical Documentation
2 items38
- Public statementCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Radancy's Responsible AI page (now governing myInterview) states a commitment to 'fairness in our models' and 'tools for transparency in results' but provides no model cards, explainability statements, or technical documentation.
- AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026
No system/model card, Article 11-style technical documentation, explainability statement, or ISO 42001 certification was found; the former myinterview.com/product-intelligence and /ai-policy pages now redirect to Radancy or return 404.
Bias Audit Transparency
2 items35
- Public statementCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Radancy's Sept 9, 2025 acquisition press release claims 'responsible AI at the core – including safeguards against bias,' but cites no audit, auditor, or disparate-impact results.
- AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026
No public NYC Local Law 144 bias-audit summary, no named independent auditor, and no downloadable audit report were found via web search or on myinterview.com / radancy.com responsible-AI and security pages.
FRIA Support
1 item25
- AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026
No EU AI Act Article 27 Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment template or deployer-obligation guidance was found on myInterview's or Radancy's sites or anywhere public.
Data Governance Disclosure
2 items42
- DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Radancy's security page (governing acquired myInterview) cites SOC 2 Type 2, HITRUST, NIST 800-171 and CSA and a GDPR-alignment statement, but no ISO 27001/42001 or AI-specific data-governance detail.
- Public statementCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Responsible AI page states the company will 'never train AI models with personal data,' the closest public data-exclusion commitment, but without a detailed training-data or exclusion-list disclosure.
Human Oversight Design
2 items48
- Public statementCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Press release states myInterview's AI ensures 'hiring decisions remain human-driven,' and the Responsible AI page commits to 'human oversight when leveraging AI,' framing the tool as decision support.
- AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026
No documentation of concrete human-oversight controls (override UI, audit logs, per-jurisdiction toggles, in-interface explanations) was found on public pages.
Post-Market Monitoring
2 items33
- DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Radancy's security page provides security/vulnerability reporting and certification claims but no model-update changelog or continuous monitoring dashboard.
- AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026
No public incident channel, model-update changelog, or continuous bias-monitoring dashboard for the myInterview AEDT was found.
Customer Documentation
2 items40
- DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Radancy's Screening & Scheduling product page (the live destination for myinterview.com) describes AI screening, one-way video, transparent scoring and Teams integration, but contains no compliance or deployer guidance.
- AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026
No publicly downloadable DPA, NYC LL 144 / EU AI Act deployer guidance, or compliance FAQ was found; myinterview.com/privacy renders only as a links landing page and the Radancy DPA URL returned 404.
§ 05 - Editorial notes
Company overview
myInterview is an async one-way video interview and AI screening platform founded in 2014, with roots in Tel Aviv and operating offices in Sydney, Australia and London, UK. Candidates record video answers to structured questions on their own schedule, and the platform's machine-learning 'Smart Shortlisting' and personality-insights features (based on a Big Five model) score and rank applicants for recruiters, with ATS, Workable and Microsoft Teams integrations. In September 2025 myInterview was acquired by Radancy and folded into the Radancy Talent Acquisition Cloud as its candidate/recruiter AI-agent, screening and scheduling layer; the myinterview.com marketing, product and blog pages now redirect to radancy.com.
Regulatory exposure
As an AI tool that scores and shortlists job candidates from video and transcribed speech, myInterview falls squarely within the scope of NYC Local Law 144 (AEDT), the EU AI Act's high-risk Annex III employment category, and emerging US state laws (Illinois AIVIA, Colorado AI Act). Despite this exposure, no public, source-linked NYC LL 144 bias audit by a named independent auditor could be located, no Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment template or EU AI Act deployer guidance is published, and no model card / Article 11-style technical documentation or ISO 42001 certification is available. Post-acquisition, the only live governance material is Radancy's principles-level Responsible AI page and a security page citing SOC 2 Type 2, HITRUST and NIST 800-171 - none of which addresses algorithmic bias auditing or per-jurisdiction AEDT compliance.
Path to a higher score
The clearest path to a higher score is to publish, on a stable and clearly linked page, an independent NYC LL 144 bias audit (auditor, date, intersectional disparate-impact tables) and to repeat it annually; add an AI/model card describing the Smart Shortlisting model, the Big Five basis, the data used and explicitly excluded (e.g., face, image and background), and an explainability statement; and produce EU AI Act deployer materials - a FRIA template and instructions-for-use - plus a publicly downloadable DPA and a documented post-market monitoring / incident channel. Surfacing the historical methodology and bias-mitigation claims as durable, versioned documentation (rather than redirected marketing copy) would materially raise the technical-documentation, bias-audit and customer-documentation scores.
§ Regulatory frame
What applies to video interview ai.
The most heavily-regulated category. NYC LL 144 has applied since 2023; EU AI Act Annex III §4 treats the assessment layer as high-risk; Mobley v. Workday is shaping vendor-liability case-law here.
§ Compare
Build any comparison→myInterview against its nearest-scoring peers.
In Video interview AI.
§ Others rated in Video interview AI
All video interview vendors→Ranked 28 of 31 by weighted total under rubric v1.0. The ordering is arithmetic on the rubric and carries no view on which tool suits a given hiring process.
- 25Canditech39F
- 26Brazen38F
- 27impress.ai38F
- 28myInterviewThis profile37F
- 29Aon Assessment35F
- 30Zappyhire34F
Conflicts of interest
No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework - the consulting firm that operates this directory - provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.
Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.