Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
impress.ai vs myInterview
impress.ai
impress.ai is a Singapore-headquartered recruitment automation platform that uses conversational AI assistants, resume parsing and scoring, and structured competency-based screening to filter, rank and shortlist job candidates, integrating with enterprise ATS systems.
Substantial gaps
Screening
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
1 point separates impress.ai and myInterview.
impress.ai (Screening) edges myInterview (Video interview) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 38 to 37. impress.ai and myInterview each lead 3 of the 7 criteria, with 1 level, though the side of the split impress.ai holds (headed by Data Governance Disclosure) adds up to more weighted points. myInterview takes the heaviest weighted swing, Bias Audit Transparency at 18% (impress.ai 22, myInterview 35), 76% of the weighted advantage it builds, while the widest raw gap is on Customer Documentation, impress.ai 58 to myInterview 40.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- impress.ai3
- myInterview3
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Customer Documentation58 vs 40
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
impress.ai is filed under Screening AI, myInterview under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | impress.ai | myInterview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | SG | AU |
| Founded | 2017 | 2014 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight34% of the movement so far
impress.ai22myInterview352.3 weighted points to myInterview
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight62% of the movement so far
impress.ai55myInterview421.9 weighted points to impress.ai
- 3
Customer Documentation
8% weight83% of the movement so far
impress.ai58myInterview401.4 weighted points to impress.ai
- 4
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight91% of the movement so far
impress.ai35myInterview380.6 weighted points to myInterview
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight98% of the movement so far
impress.ai52myInterview480.5 weighted points to impress.ai
- 6
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
impress.ai32myInterview330.1 weighted points to myInterview
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +0.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +0.8.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is impress.ai minus myInterview, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | impress.ai | myInterview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 35 | -13 | -2.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 42 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 48 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 32 | 33 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 40 | +18 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 38F | 37F | +1 | +0.8 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | impress.ai | myInterview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain |
impress.ai has 25 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 25 for impress.ai, across 1 distinct source domain, and 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- impress.ai last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.