§ The result
2 points separate Canditech and myInterview.
Canditech (Assessment) edges myInterview (Video interview) by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 39 to 37. Canditech leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Data Governance Disclosure, while myInterview leads 3, including Bias Audit Transparency. The heaviest weighted swing runs the other way — myInterview takes Bias Audit Transparency at 18%, Canditech 25 to myInterview 35, 85% of the weighted advantage myInterview holds — while the widest raw gap sits on Customer Documentation, Canditech 58 to myInterview 40.
Vendor profile
Canditech
Canditech is a skills-assessment and job-simulation platform that screens candidates with work-sample tests, technical and soft-skill assessments, and one-way video interviews, using AI agents to auto-score open-text and video responses.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
§ The record
Canditech is filed under Assessment AI, myInterview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Canditech | myInterview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | IL | AU |
| Founded | 2019 | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 28% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Canditech 25 · myInterview 35
1.8 weighted points to myInterview
15% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Canditech 52 · myInterview 42
1.5 weighted points to Canditech
8% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Canditech 58 · myInterview 40
1.4 weighted points to Canditech
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Canditech 30 · myInterview 25
0.8 weighted points to Canditech
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Canditech 53 · myInterview 48
0.6 weighted points to Canditech
20% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Canditech 37 · myInterview 38
0.2 weighted points to myInterview
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Canditech 32 · myInterview 33
0.1 weighted points to myInterview
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +2.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +2 beside that +2.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Canditech minus myInterview.
| Category | Weight | Canditech | myInterview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 37 | 38 | -1 | -0.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 42 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 53 | 48 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 32 | 33 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 40 | +18 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 39 (F) | 37 (F) | +2 | +2.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Canditech | myInterview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain |
Canditech has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 31 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Canditech, across 1 distinct source domain, and 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Canditech last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next