Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Cezanne Recruitment vs Recruitly

Export comparison (CSV)ProBuild another comparison
Vendor profile

Cezanne Recruitment

Level

Cezanne Recruitment (formerly Occupop) is an applicant tracking system for SMEs that handles job posting, candidate management and interview scheduling. In its Recruitment PLUS+ tier it uses AI to score each CV from 0 to 100 against the job description, alongside weighted screening-question scores, knockout filters and optional AI anonymisation of CVs for hiring-manager review.

41/ 100
F

Substantial gaps

ATS-integrated

View profile
Vendor profile

Recruitly

Level

Recruitly is an all-in-one ATS and CRM for recruitment agencies. It includes AI candidate matching, which ranks candidates against live jobs and shows its reasons, and AI application review, which scores and explains each applicant against the job spec. It also offers external profile sourcing, CV parsing, an AI phone system and an AI meeting assistant.

41/ 100
F

Substantial gaps

ATS-integrated

View profile

The result

Cezanne Recruitment and Recruitly tie at 41.

Cezanne Recruitment and Recruitly, both in the ATS-integrated cohort, tie at 41 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Cezanne Recruitment leads 2 of the 7 criteria and Recruitly 5, yet the two totals land on the same number. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Cezanne Recruitment 24, Recruitly 15 — and at an 18% weight it carries 55% of the weighted advantage Cezanne Recruitment holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • Cezanne Recruitment2
  • Recruitly5
Widest raw gap
Bias Audit Transparency24 vs 15
Heaviest weighted swing
Bias Audit Transparency18% weight

Keep this comparison

Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.

Sent once, with links to turn on alerts for either vendor. No list.

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

Cezanne Recruitment and Recruitly are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

RecordCezanne RecruitmentRecruitly
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersGBAE
Founded20122015

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Bias Audit Transparency

    18% weight30% of the movement so far

    Cezanne Recruitment24
    Recruitly15

    1.6 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  2. Data Governance Disclosure

    15% weight54% of the movement so far

    Cezanne Recruitment54
    Recruitly45

    1.3 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

  3. FRIA Support

    15% weight74% of the movement so far

    Cezanne Recruitment28
    Recruitly35

    1.1 weighted points to Recruitly

  4. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    20% weight92% of the movement so far

    Cezanne Recruitment40
    Recruitly45

    1.0 weighted points to Recruitly

  5. Human Oversight Design

    12% weight96% of the movement so far

    Cezanne Recruitment58
    Recruitly60

    0.2 weighted points to Recruitly

  6. Post-Market Monitoring

    12% weight99% of the movement so far

    Cezanne Recruitment44
    Recruitly45

    0.1 weighted points to Recruitly

  7. Customer Documentation

    8% weight100% of the movement so far

    Cezanne Recruitment57
    Recruitly58

    0.1 weighted points to Recruitly

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.5.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus Recruitly, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightCezanne RecruitmentRecruitlyΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4045-5-1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2415+9+1.6
FRIA Support15%2835-7-1.1
Data Governance Disclosure15%5445+9+1.3
Human Oversight Design12%5860-2-0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4445-1-0.1
Customer Documentation8%5758-1-0.1
Total100%41F41F-+0.5

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCezanne RecruitmentRecruitly
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on the vendor's own domain70Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%256Sources on the vendor's own domain325Sources on the vendor's own domain

Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Recruitly has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 68 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 37 for Recruitly, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Recruitly last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next