HomeCompareClasset vs Eightfold AI

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Classet vs Eightfold AI

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Eightfold AI leads Classet by 9 points.

Under rubric v1.0, Eightfold AI, filed under Sourcing, finishes on 64 (D) and Classet, filed under Screening, on 55 (F), 9 points apart. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of Eightfold AI: Eightfold AI is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Classet on Post-Market Monitoring. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Classet 46, Eightfold AI 75 — and at a 20% weight it carries 56% of the weighted advantage Eightfold AI holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Classet is filed under Screening AI, Eightfold AI under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: ATS-integrated.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Classet is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordClassetEightfold AI
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20212016

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 51% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Classet 46 · Eightfold AI 75

    5.8 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  2. 15% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Classet 33 · Eightfold AI 45

    1.8 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  3. 18% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Classet 76 · Eightfold AI 85

    1.6 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  4. 12% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Classet 58 · Eightfold AI 50

    1.0 weighted points to Classet

  5. 12% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Classet 55 · Eightfold AI 60

    0.6 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  6. 15% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Classet 57 · Eightfold AI 60

    0.4 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Classet 62 · Eightfold AI 60

    0.2 weighted points to Classet

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -9.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Classet minus Eightfold AI.

CategoryWeightClassetEightfold AIΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4675-29-5.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%7685-9-1.6
FRIA Support15%3345-12-1.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5760-3-0.4
Human Oversight Design12%5560-5-0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%5850+8+1.0
Customer Documentation8%6260+2+0.2
Total100%55 (F)64 (D)-9-9.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightClassetEightfold AI
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%40Audit reportSources on a separate domain30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain10—
Human Oversight Design12%80Sources on the vendor's own domain10—
Post-Market Monitoring12%51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11—
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%335Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain132Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Classet has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 33 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Eightfold AI has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Classet and Eightfold AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for Classet, across 3 distinct source domains, and 15 for Eightfold AI, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Classet last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Eightfold AI last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.