HomeCompareClearCo (ClearCompany) vs Cognisess

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

ClearCo (ClearCompany) vs Cognisess

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

ClearCo (ClearCompany) leads Cognisess on all 7 criteria.

Under rubric v1.0, ClearCo (ClearCompany) (ATS-integrated) opens a 16-point lead on Cognisess (Assessment), 46 to 30. Cognisess leads none of the 7 criteria, and ClearCo (ClearCompany) is ahead on 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (ClearCo (ClearCompany) 56, Cognisess 25, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 38% of the weighted advantage ClearCo (ClearCompany) holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

ClearCo (ClearCompany) is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Cognisess under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Cognisess is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordClearCo (ClearCompany)Cognisess
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded20042011

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 38% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    ClearCo (ClearCompany) 56 · Cognisess 25

    6.2 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  2. 12% weight · 54% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    ClearCo (ClearCompany) 63 · Cognisess 42

    2.5 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  3. 15% weight · 68% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    ClearCo (ClearCompany) 57 · Cognisess 42

    2.3 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  4. 8% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    ClearCo (ClearCompany) 60 · Cognisess 40

    1.6 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  5. 15% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    ClearCo (ClearCompany) 30 · Cognisess 20

    1.5 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  6. 18% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    ClearCo (ClearCompany) 28 · Cognisess 20

    1.4 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    ClearCo (ClearCompany) 37 · Cognisess 32

    0.6 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +16.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +16 beside that +16.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is ClearCo (ClearCompany) minus Cognisess.

CategoryWeightClearCo (ClearCompany)CognisessΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5625+31+6.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%2820+8+1.4
FRIA Support15%3020+10+1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%5742+15+2.3
Human Oversight Design12%6342+21+2.5
Post-Market Monitoring12%3732+5+0.6
Customer Documentation8%6040+20+1.6
Total100%46 (F)30 (F)+16+16.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightClearCo (ClearCompany)Cognisess
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Sources on a separate domain21—
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain50Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%42Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%317Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain215Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

ClearCo (ClearCompany) has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Cognisess has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for ClearCo (ClearCompany) and Cognisess sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for ClearCo (ClearCompany), across 3 distinct source domains, and 26 for Cognisess, across 5 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
ClearCo (ClearCompany) last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Cognisess last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.