HomeVendorsCognisess
Profile · Vendor·AssessmentVideo interviewScreening

Cognisess

UK talent-analytics platform that scores candidates and employees with 50+ game-based and questionnaire assessments and weighted job-fit 'profilers', can auto-pass or auto-reject applicants against score thresholds, and runs recorded video interviews with optional DeepLearn video analytics.

HireAIScore rates Cognisess 30 out of 100 (grade F, Substantial gaps) under rubric v1.0, last reviewed September 25, 2026. Cognisess ranks 82 of 82 vendors rated in Assessment AI, against a category average of 46. That score is drawn from 26 evidence items across 7 rubric criteria for Cognisess — 21 with a cited source, 5 recording that nothing was located.

§ 01 - Company facts

Legal name
Cognisess Limited
Founded
2011
Headquarters
United Kingdom · GB
Pricing tier
Mid
Market side
Employer-side (AEDT)
Categories
AssessmentVideo interviewScreening
Website
cognisess.com

These are company details, not findings. They are editable by a verified representative and carry no weight in the score, which is built only from the cited evidence below.

§ 02 - Score breakdown

§ Score breakdown

Category scoring

Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.

  1. 01

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Weight 20%

    25

    +5.0 · category avg 50

  2. 02

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Weight 18%

    20

    +3.6 · category avg 41

  3. 03

    FRIA Support

    Weight 15%

    20

    +3.0 · category avg 31

  4. 04

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Weight 15%

    42

    +6.3 · category avg 53

  5. 05

    Human Oversight Design

    Weight 12%

    42

    +5.0 · category avg 55

  6. 06

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Weight 12%

    32

    +3.8 · category avg 38

  7. 07

    Customer Documentation

    Weight 8%

    40

    +3.2 · category avg 58

Category avg is the mean raw score on that criterion across the 82 Assessment AI vendors in scope of this rubric, this one included.

Total weighted score: 30.0(rounded to 30 for display)

§ 03 - Strongest · weakest

Strongest category

Human Oversight Design

Raw score 42 · contributes 5.0 to total.

42 against a 55 category average

Weakest category

FRIA Support

Raw score 20 · contributes 3.0 to total.

20 against a 31 category average

§ 04 - Cited evidence

Download diligence record→

§ Evidence

Cited per category

Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence.

Evidence ledger

Items
26
Documentation
14
Public statement
7
Absence
5
With a source URL
21 of 26
Source hostnames
6
Fewest items
3
Article 11 Technical Documentation

These figures measure how thoroughly Cognisess was reviewed, not how Cognisess performed — an absence row, recording that nothing was located, is counted like any other item.

Article 11 Technical Documentation

3 items25
  • AbsenceCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    No model card, technical file, instructions for use, explainability statement or ISO/IEC 42001 certificate is published: the relaunched cognisess.com sitemap has ten URLs of marketing and legal pages, the Privasee privacy portal has none, and the 'Ethical AI statement' cited in the data protection policy is not linked anywhere.

    Have a URL that disputes this?→

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The live data protection policy is the only current description of the AI; it says processing covers 'the calculation of job profiler scores, the calculation of inferred variables and attribute values, and the work of the AI models that comprise our video analytics tool', and gives no model logic, inputs or limitations.

    https://www.cognisess.com/data-protection-policy

  • Public statementCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The Ethical AI page (published 2022, last archived 20 January 2026, now 404) offered only principles, such as models 'tested for adverse impact' and protected characteristics never used, and pointed to a 'full Ethical AI policy' that was never linked.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20260120095515/https://cognisess.com/ethical-ai-2/

Bias Audit Transparency

3 items20
  • AbsenceCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    No independent bias audit, adverse-impact statistics or NYC LL 144 summary is published on cognisess.com, in its privacy portal, on its archived pages or on any third-party audit dashboard checked (trust.warden-ai.com/cognisess returns 404).

    Have a URL that disputes this?→

  • Public statementCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    A July 2019 blog post, still live in February 2026, claimed the video tool 'has analysed over 1.4 billion facial expressions with a 97% accuracy rate' and 'isn't programmed to see race, age or gender', supported only by an unquantified single-customer correlation with assessor ratings.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20260217233656/https://cognisess.com/how-to-interview-thousands-of-applicants-with-video-analysis/

  • Public statementCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The About page says its data is 'All validated with live benchmarking across education, employment, and leadership contexts' and sells 'fairness audits' as a consulting service, but publishes no validation study, impact ratios or named auditor.

    https://www.cognisess.com/about

FRIA Support

3 items20

Data Governance Disclosure

5 items42
  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The data protection policy says Cognisess 'does not scrape data from the Internet'. It collects demographic data optionally for bias monitoring, hosts data on Azure in the UK, Europe, Australia and China, deletes accounts inactive for two years while keeping anonymised scores for norming, and hides personality answers and undisclosed disabilities from employers.

    https://www.cognisess.com/data-protection-policy

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The DPA lists 'Self-recorded audio and video files' and 'biometric / bio-mechanical performance data' (heart rate, EEG, ECG) among processed data, but its transfer terms are out of date: they cite Privacy Shield, the 2004/2010 SCCs and Directive 95/46/EC, and describe GDPR as becoming enforceable on 25 May 2018.

    https://www.cognisess.com/data-processing-agreement

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The data behind Cognisess's Privasee privacy notice (linked from its footer as the Privacy Policy) names DPO Phil Greening and ICO registration ZA290016 and lists Azure (EEA, Australia) and Microsoft authentication (US) as sub-processors. It declares no biometric data and no automated decision-making, which contradicts the DPA and the video-analytics feature.

    https://products.privasee.io/api/privacy-portal/655f5b9b805bda0013437200

  • Public statementCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The Video Analyser product page, live until at least 18 February 2026 and now removed, said 'Our AI driven video analytics tool measures facial expressions and language' and that Deep Learn can 'measure different facets of behaviour and emotion based on facial expressions and language used', without saying how that facial data is governed.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20260218000400/https://cognisess.com/video-analyser/

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The pre-relaunch homepage showed a UKAS ISO 27001 mark alongside 'Certificate Number 20831' (the current footer shows only the number), but the certifying body, scope and validity are not published.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20260306201220/https://cognisess.com/

Human Oversight Design

5 items42

Post-Market Monitoring

3 items32
  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The terms, last updated 27 November 2017, give security@cognisess.com as the security contact, promise to notify subscribers of security flaws, and guarantee 99% uptime measured on the login page by an external monitor.

    https://www.cognisess.com/terms-and-conditions

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    status.cognisess.com is a StatusCake public report titled 'Cognisess Status' that lists no monitored services, uptime figures, announcements or incident history.

    https://status.cognisess.com/

  • AbsenceCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Cognisess publishes no model-update changelog, incident disclosures, bias-drift monitoring results or security.txt (www.cognisess.com/.well-known/security.txt returns 404), and the archived Ethical AI page's promise to routinely re-check its models disappeared in the 2026 relaunch.

    Have a URL that disputes this?→

Customer Documentation

4 items40
  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Current product pages are short marketing lists such as '50+ Enterprise Assessments', 'Automated Candidate Shortlisting', 'Predictive Performance Scoring' and 'DE&I Tracking & Dashboards', with no methodology, no video-analysis disclosure and no compliance guidance.

    https://www.cognisess.com/solutions

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The live app's interface text still offers a 'Video analytics' setting ('Get extensive analysis of user videos. Contact us at support@cognisess.com to enable this feature.'), a 'Video analytics report' on 'the video analytics that DeepLearn™ can provide' and a 'Facial expression' section, none of which the public website discloses.

    https://cognisesscdnprod.azureedge.net/cognisess-4-29-0-392/public/locales/WebResources.json

  • DocumentationCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    Until early 2026 a GDPR guidance page for clients covered lawful bases, data minimisation through staged assessment, Azure data residency and fully anonymised 'blind' recruitment, but it was removed in the relaunch along with the knowledge base.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20260120083659/https://cognisess.com/gdpr/

  • AbsenceCaptured Sep 25, 2026

    The live site has no FAQ, resource hub, candidate-notice template or NYC LL 144 / EU AI Act guidance, and the terms still point customers to a data-processing addendum at 'cognisess.wpengine.com/terms-of-use' that returns 404.

    Have a URL that disputes this?→

§ 05 - Editorial notes

§ Regulatory frame

What applies to assessment ai.

Assessment is the most-regulated surface in AI hiring. NYC LL 144, EEOC and OFCCP frameworks, Illinois HB 3773, and EU AI Act Annex III §4 all apply, with overlap on bias-audit obligations.

§ Others rated in Assessment AI

All assessment vendors→

Ranked 82 of 82 by weighted total under rubric v1.0. The ordering is arithmetic on the rubric and carries no view on which tool suits a given hiring process.

  1. 79Pulsifi33F
  2. 80Arena Analytics32F
  3. 81Intervue.io31F
  4. 82CognisessThis profile30F

Conflicts of interest

No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework - the consulting firm that operates this directory - provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.

Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.