Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
ClearCo (ClearCompany) vs HiBob
ClearCo (ClearCompany)
ClearCo (formerly ClearCompany) is a unified talent-management suite built around an applicant tracking system. Its AI Talent Match scores and ranks new applicants against a requisition's skills and job titles, and its Sourcing Agent runs AI-conducted phone screening calls and returns applicants ranked by score.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
HiBob
HiBob's Bob is an all-in-one HR platform whose Bob Hiring applicant tracking module uses AI to give each application an explainable match score against recruiter-defined criteria (AI CV Matching) and to draft job descriptions, interview scorecards and candidate emails.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
ClearCo (ClearCompany) and HiBob tie at 46.
ClearCo (ClearCompany) and HiBob, both in the ATS-integrated cohort, tie at 46 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. ClearCo (ClearCompany) leads 2 of the 7 criteria and HiBob 3, with 2 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. ClearCo (ClearCompany) takes the heaviest weighted swing, Bias Audit Transparency at 18% (ClearCo (ClearCompany) 28, HiBob 20), which is 88% of the weighted advantage ClearCo (ClearCompany) holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, Post-Market Monitoring, ClearCo (ClearCompany) 37 to HiBob 47.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- ClearCo (ClearCompany)2
- HiBob3
- Level2
- Widest raw gap
- Post-Market Monitoring37 vs 47
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
ClearCo (ClearCompany) and HiBob are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | ClearCo (ClearCompany) | HiBob |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2004 | 2015 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight39% of the movement so far
ClearCo (ClearCompany)28HiBob201.4 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight72% of the movement so far
ClearCo (ClearCompany)37HiBob471.2 weighted points to HiBob
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight92% of the movement so far
ClearCo (ClearCompany)30HiBob350.8 weighted points to HiBob
- 4
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight98% of the movement so far
ClearCo (ClearCompany)56HiBob550.2 weighted points to ClearCo (ClearCompany)
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
ClearCo (ClearCompany)60HiBob610.1 weighted points to HiBob
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -0.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.4.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is ClearCo (ClearCompany) minus HiBob, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | ClearCo (ClearCompany) | HiBob | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 56 | 55 | +1 | +0.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 28 | 20 | +8 | +1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 57 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 63 | 63 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 37 | 47 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 61 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Total | 100% | 46F | 46F | - | -0.4 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | ClearCo (ClearCompany) | HiBob | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 31 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
ClearCo (ClearCompany) has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; HiBob has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for ClearCo (ClearCompany) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 74 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for ClearCo (ClearCompany), across 3 distinct source domains, and 36 for HiBob, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- ClearCo (ClearCompany) last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HiBob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.