HomeCompareClevry vs Oracle Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Clevry vs Oracle Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

4 points separate Oracle Recruiting and Clevry.

Oracle Recruiting holds a 4-point edge over Clevry under rubric v1.0, 49 to 45, across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Oracle Recruiting: Oracle Recruiting is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Clevry on Bias Audit Transparency. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Post-Market Monitoring (Clevry 30, Oracle Recruiting 40) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Clevry 52, Oracle Recruiting 60), the second being 34% of the weighted advantage Oracle Recruiting holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Clevry is filed under Assessment AI, Oracle Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Clevry is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordClevryOracle Recruiting
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersGBUS
Founded19911977

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 26% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Clevry 52 · Oracle Recruiting 60

    1.6 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  2. 18% weight · 50% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Clevry 38 · Oracle Recruiting 30

    1.4 weighted points to Clevry

  3. 12% weight · 69% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Clevry 30 · Oracle Recruiting 40

    1.2 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  4. 15% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Clevry 30 · Oracle Recruiting 35

    0.8 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  5. 15% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Clevry 55 · Oracle Recruiting 60

    0.8 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  6. 12% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Clevry 58 · Oracle Recruiting 60

    0.2 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Clevry 60 · Oracle Recruiting 62

    0.2 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -3.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -4 beside that -3.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Clevry minus Oracle Recruiting.

CategoryWeightClevryOracle RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5260-8-1.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%3830+8+1.4
FRIA Support15%3035-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5560-5-0.8
Human Oversight Design12%5860-2-0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3040-10-1.2
Customer Documentation8%6062-2-0.2
Total100%45 (F)49 (F)-4-3.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightClevryOracle Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%71Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%61Sources on the vendor's own domain12—
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%70Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%70Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%395Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain134Sources on the vendor's own domain

Clevry has 44 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 39 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Oracle Recruiting has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Clevry sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 60 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 44 for Clevry, across 2 distinct source domains, and 16 for Oracle Recruiting, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Clevry last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Oracle Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.