HomeCompareClevry vs Retorio

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Clevry vs Retorio

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

1 point separates Clevry and Retorio.

Under rubric v1.0, Clevry and Retorio finish 1 point apart, 45 to 44, as two Assessment entries. Retorio takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 4 for Clevry, whose share includes Customer Documentation, and 1 is level. Even Customer Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Clevry 60, Retorio 50, 8% weight), is only 34% of the weighted advantage Clevry builds across the 4 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Clevry and Retorio are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordClevryRetorio
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersGBDE
Founded19912018

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 8% weight · 26% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Clevry 60 · Retorio 50

    0.8 weighted points to Clevry

  2. 12% weight · 49% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Clevry 58 · Retorio 52

    0.7 weighted points to Clevry

  3. 15% weight · 64% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Clevry 55 · Retorio 52

    0.4 weighted points to Clevry

  4. 20% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Clevry 52 · Retorio 50

    0.4 weighted points to Clevry

  5. 18% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Clevry 38 · Retorio 40

    0.4 weighted points to Retorio

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Clevry 30 · Retorio 33

    0.4 weighted points to Retorio

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +1.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Clevry minus Retorio.

CategoryWeightClevryRetorioΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5250+2+0.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%3840-2-0.4
FRIA Support15%3030--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5552+3+0.4
Human Oversight Design12%5852+6+0.7
Post-Market Monitoring12%3033-3-0.4
Customer Documentation8%6050+10+0.8
Total100%45 (F)44 (F)+1+1.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightClevryRetorio
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%71Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%61Sources on the vendor's own domain31Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%70Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%70Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%395Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain166Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Clevry has 44 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 39 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Retorio has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Clevry and Retorio sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 66 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 44 for Clevry, across 2 distinct source domains, and 22 for Retorio, across 4 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Clevry last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Retorio last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.