HomeCompareClevry vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Clevry vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads Clevry on all 7 criteria.

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting scores 53 and Clevry 45 under rubric v1.0, an 8-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting is ahead of Clevry on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Bias Audit Transparency at Clevry 38 to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Clevry 52, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 49% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Clevry is filed under Assessment AI, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Clevry is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordClevrySAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersGBDE
Founded19911972

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 49% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Clevry 52 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70

    3.6 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  2. 12% weight · 66% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Clevry 30 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    1.2 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. 15% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Clevry 30 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35

    0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  4. 15% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Clevry 55 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60

    0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  5. 12% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Clevry 58 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.5 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  6. 18% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Clevry 38 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    0.4 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Clevry 60 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.2 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -7.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -7.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Clevry minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

CategoryWeightClevrySAP SuccessFactors RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5270-18-3.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%3840-2-0.4
FRIA Support15%3035-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5560-5-0.8
Human Oversight Design12%5862-4-0.5
Post-Market Monitoring12%3040-10-1.2
Customer Documentation8%6062-2-0.2
Total100%45 (F)53 (F)-8-7.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightClevrySAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%71Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%61Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%70Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%70Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%395Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Clevry has 44 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 39 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Clevry and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 66 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 44 for Clevry, across 2 distinct source domains, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Clevry last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.