HomeCompareClevry vs Tezi

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Clevry vs Tezi

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Tezi leads Clevry by 13 points.

Tezi sits 13 points above Clevry under rubric v1.0 — 58 against 45 — with Tezi filed under Screening and Clevry under Assessment. Tezi leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Clevry leads 1, including Customer Documentation, and 2 are level. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Clevry 38, Tezi 83) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 61% of the weighted advantage Tezi holds across the 4 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Clevry is filed under Assessment AI, Tezi under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Clevry is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordClevryTezi
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersGBUS
Founded19912024

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 58% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Clevry 38 · Tezi 83

    8.1 weighted points to Tezi

  2. 12% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Clevry 30 · Tezi 58

    3.4 weighted points to Tezi

  3. 15% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Clevry 30 · Tezi 38

    1.2 weighted points to Tezi

  4. 8% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Clevry 60 · Tezi 50

    0.8 weighted points to Clevry

  5. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Clevry 58 · Tezi 63

    0.6 weighted points to Tezi

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -12.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -12.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Clevry minus Tezi.

CategoryWeightClevryTeziΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5252--
Bias Audit Transparency18%3883-45-8.1
FRIA Support15%3038-8-1.2
Data Governance Disclosure15%5555--
Human Oversight Design12%5863-5-0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%3058-28-3.4
Customer Documentation8%6050+10+0.8
Total100%45 (F)58 (F)-13-12.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightClevryTezi
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%71Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Bias Audit Transparency18%61Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Data Governance Disclosure15%70Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%70Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20—
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%395Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain113Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Clevry has 44 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 39 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Tezi has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Clevry and Tezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 44 for Clevry, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Tezi, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Clevry last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Tezi last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.