§ The result
Maki People leads Coderbyte on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 separates Maki People and Coderbyte, both Assessment entries, by 25 points: 67 (D) for Maki People, 42 (F) for Coderbyte. Maki People leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Coderbyte leads none. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Coderbyte 20, Maki People 80) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 45% of the weighted advantage Maki People holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Coderbyte
Coderbyte is a technical hiring platform offering coding assessments with automated and AI grading of challenges and take-home projects, live coding interviews, and AI screening that grades resumes against job-description criteria and runs agentic phone screens.
Vendor profile
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
§ The record
Coderbyte and Maki People are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Coderbyte | Maki People |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | FR |
| Founded | 2012 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 45% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Coderbyte 20 · Maki People 80
10.8 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 63% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Coderbyte 33 · Maki People 62
4.3 weighted points to Maki People
20% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Coderbyte 44 · Maki People 64
4.0 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Coderbyte 40 · Maki People 55
1.8 weighted points to Maki People
8% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Coderbyte 58 · Maki People 74
1.3 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Coderbyte 56 · Maki People 64
1.2 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Coderbyte 60 · Maki People 66
0.7 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -24.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 24.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -25 beside that -24.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Coderbyte minus Maki People.
| Category | Weight | Coderbyte | Maki People | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 44 | 64 | -20 | -4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 80 | -60 | -10.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 33 | 62 | -29 | -4.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 64 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 66 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 55 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 74 | -16 | -1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 67 (D) | -25 | -24.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Coderbyte | Maki People | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 25 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Coderbyte has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Maki People has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Coderbyte and Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 62 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Coderbyte, across 2 distinct source domains, and 31 for Maki People, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Coderbyte last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Maki People last reviewed
- September 8, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next