§ The result
HeyMilo leads CoderPad on all 7 criteria.
HeyMilo finishes 19 points clear of CoderPad under rubric v1.0 — 61 (D) against 42 (F) — across the Screening and Assessment cohorts. HeyMilo leads every one of the 7 criteria, CoderPad none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Post-Market Monitoring, CoderPad 44 to HeyMilo 46. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (CoderPad 20, HeyMilo 83) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 60% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
CoderPad
CoderPad is a technical hiring platform that auto-scores and ranks candidates on coding assessments (Screen), uses an AI reviewer to evaluate and rank applicants' asynchronous video pre-screen responses against employer criteria (Qualify), and hosts live collaborative coding interviews with AI assistance, note-taking and summaries (Interview).
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
§ The record
CoderPad is filed under Assessment AI, HeyMilo under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | CoderPad | HeyMilo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 2023 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
CoderPad 20 · HeyMilo 83
11.3 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
CoderPad 45 · HeyMilo 58
2.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
CoderPad 28 · HeyMilo 42
2.1 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
CoderPad 54 · HeyMilo 62
1.2 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
CoderPad 57 · HeyMilo 64
0.8 weighted points to HeyMilo
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
CoderPad 58 · HeyMilo 66
0.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
CoderPad 44 · HeyMilo 46
0.2 weighted points to HeyMilo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -19.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -19 beside that -19.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is CoderPad minus HeyMilo.
| Category | Weight | CoderPad | HeyMilo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 58 | -13 | -2.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 83 | -63 | -11.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 42 | -14 | -2.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 62 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 64 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 46 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 66 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 61 (D) | -19 | -19.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | CoderPad | HeyMilo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 32 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
CoderPad has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for CoderPad and HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for CoderPad, across 2 distinct source domains, and 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- CoderPad last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next