§ The result
Pinpoint leads CoderPad on all 7 criteria.
Pinpoint finishes 15 points clear of CoderPad under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 42 — across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. Of the 7 criteria CoderPad wins none, and the narrowest lead Pinpoint holds is on Human Oversight Design, CoderPad 57 to Pinpoint 64. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (CoderPad 45, Pinpoint 72, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 35% of the weighted advantage Pinpoint holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
CoderPad
CoderPad is a technical hiring platform that auto-scores and ranks candidates on coding assessments (Screen), uses an AI reviewer to evaluate and rank applicants' asynchronous video pre-screen responses against employer criteria (Qualify), and hosts live collaborative coding interviews with AI assistance, note-taking and summaries (Interview).
Vendor profile
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows - candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
§ The record
CoderPad is filed under Assessment AI, Pinpoint under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only CoderPad is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | CoderPad | Pinpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | JE |
| Founded | 2013 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
CoderPad 45 · Pinpoint 72
5.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
18% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
CoderPad 20 · Pinpoint 42
4.0 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
CoderPad 54 · Pinpoint 68
2.1 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
CoderPad 28 · Pinpoint 38
1.5 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
CoderPad 44 · Pinpoint 52
1.0 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
CoderPad 57 · Pinpoint 64
0.8 weighted points to Pinpoint
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
CoderPad 58 · Pinpoint 66
0.6 weighted points to Pinpoint
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -15.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -15 beside that -15.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is CoderPad minus Pinpoint.
| Category | Weight | CoderPad | Pinpoint | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 72 | -27 | -5.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 42 | -22 | -4.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 38 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 68 | -14 | -2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 64 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 52 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 66 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 57 (F) | -15 | -15.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | CoderPad | Pinpoint | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 32 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 18 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
CoderPad has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Pinpoint has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for CoderPad sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for CoderPad, across 2 distinct source domains, and 20 for Pinpoint, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- CoderPad last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pinpoint last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next