§ The result
CodeSignal leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
CodeSignal, filed under Assessment, comes out 14 points above JobDiva, filed under ATS-integrated: 43 against 29 under rubric v1.0. CodeSignal takes all 7 criteria and JobDiva none of them; the nearest contest is FRIA Support, CodeSignal 25 to JobDiva 22. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (CodeSignal 45, JobDiva 15, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 39% of the weighted advantage CodeSignal holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
CodeSignal
CodeSignal is a technical skills assessment and interview platform for developer hiring that adds AI features including an AI Interviewer, AI-assisted/agentic coding assessments, and AI-plus-human proctoring.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
§ The record
CodeSignal is filed under Assessment AI, JobDiva under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only CodeSignal is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | CodeSignal | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2003 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
CodeSignal 45 · JobDiva 15
5.4 weighted points to CodeSignal
20% weight · 53% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
CodeSignal 38 · JobDiva 28
2.0 weighted points to CodeSignal
15% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
CodeSignal 50 · JobDiva 38
1.8 weighted points to CodeSignal
12% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
CodeSignal 55 · JobDiva 40
1.8 weighted points to CodeSignal
8% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
CodeSignal 62 · JobDiva 42
1.6 weighted points to CodeSignal
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
CodeSignal 38 · JobDiva 30
1.0 weighted points to CodeSignal
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
CodeSignal 25 · JobDiva 22
0.4 weighted points to CodeSignal
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +14.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +14 beside that +14.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is CodeSignal minus JobDiva.
| Category | Weight | CodeSignal | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 28 | +10 | +2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 45 | 15 | +30 | +5.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 22 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 38 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 40 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 30 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 42 | +20 | +1.6 |
| Total | 100% | 43 (F) | 29 (F) | +14 | +14.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | CodeSignal | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 15 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
CodeSignal has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for CodeSignal, across 1 distinct source domain, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- CodeSignal last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next