Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Codility vs Mercer | Mettl
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Codility
Codility is a technical/coding assessment platform that screens and interviews software engineers with work-sample coding tests, live technical interviews, and integrity tooling including plagiarism and AI-use detection.
Vendor profile
Mercer | Mettl
Mercer | Mettl is an online talent assessment and remote-proctoring platform offering psychometric, aptitude, coding, and skills tests plus AI-assisted exam proctoring and scoring for hiring, certification, and L&D.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Codility minus Mercer | Mettl.
| Category | Weight | Codility | Mercer | Mettl | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 38 | +22 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 45 | 42 | +3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 28 | +14 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 55 | +2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 45 | +17 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 38 | +12 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 52 | +14 |
| Total | 100% | 54 (F) | 42 (F) | +12 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Codility
20 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 15
- absence
- 4
- public statement
- 1
Evidence count
Mercer | Mettl
14 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 7
- absence
- 5
- public statement
- 2