§ The result
Codility leads Turing on all 7 criteria.
Codility finishes 18 points clear of Turing inside the Assessment cohort under rubric v1.0: 54 against 36. Codility leads every one of the 7 criteria, Turing none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Data Governance Disclosure, Codility 57 to Turing 44. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Post-Market Monitoring (Codility 50, Turing 27) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Codility 60, Turing 42), the second being 21% of the weighted advantage Codility holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Codility
Codility is a technical/coding assessment platform that screens and interviews software engineers with work-sample coding tests, live technical interviews, and integrity tooling including plagiarism and AI-use detection.
Vendor profile
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
§ The record
Codility and Turing are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Codility | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2009 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 21% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Codility 60 · Turing 42
3.6 weighted points to Codility
18% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Codility 45 · Turing 28
3.1 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Codility 50 · Turing 27
2.8 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 69% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Codility 42 · Turing 25
2.5 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Codility 62 · Turing 45
2.0 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Codility 57 · Turing 44
1.9 weighted points to Codility
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Codility 66 · Turing 48
1.4 weighted points to Codility
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +17.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +18 beside that +17.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Codility minus Turing.
| Category | Weight | Codility | Turing | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 42 | +18 | +3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 45 | 28 | +17 | +3.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 25 | +17 | +2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 44 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 45 | +17 | +2.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 27 | +23 | +2.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 48 | +18 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 54 (F) | 36 (F) | +18 | +17.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Codility | Turing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Codility has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Codility, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Codility last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next