HomeCompareCognisess vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Cognisess vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads Cognisess on all 7 criteria.

Under rubric v1.0, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting (ATS-integrated) opens a 23-point lead on Cognisess (Assessment), 53 to 30. Cognisess leads none of the 7 criteria, and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting is ahead on 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Cognisess 25, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70 — and at a 20% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Cognisess is filed under Assessment AI, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Cognisess is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCognisessSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersGBDE
Founded20111972

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 40% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Cognisess 25 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70

    9.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  2. 18% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Cognisess 20 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    3.6 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. 15% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Cognisess 42 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60

    2.7 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  4. 12% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Cognisess 42 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    2.4 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  5. 15% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Cognisess 20 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35

    2.3 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  6. 8% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Cognisess 40 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    1.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Cognisess 32 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    1.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -22.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -23 beside that -22.7.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Cognisess minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

CategoryWeightCognisessSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%2570-45-9.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2040-20-3.6
FRIA Support15%2035-15-2.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%4260-18-2.7
Human Oversight Design12%4262-20-2.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%3240-8-1.0
Customer Documentation8%4062-22-1.8
Total100%30 (F)53 (F)-23-22.7

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCognisessSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21—21Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on a separate domain30Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%215Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Cognisess has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cognisess and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for Cognisess, across 5 distinct source domains, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Cognisess last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.