§ The result
HireVue leads ConverzAI by 14 points.
HireVue sits 14 points above ConverzAI under rubric v1.0 — 58 against 44 — with HireVue filed under Video interview and ConverzAI under Screening. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of HireVue: HireVue is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and ConverzAI on Post-Market Monitoring. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (ConverzAI 30, HireVue 65) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 50% of the weighted advantage HireVue holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
ConverzAI
ConverzAI's Virtual Recruiter is an agentic voice, SMS and email AI agent for staffing firms. It contacts applicants within minutes, runs role-specific screening interviews, scores candidates' fit to open jobs and updates the firm's ATS.
Vendor profile
HireVue
Asynchronous video interviewing platform with optional AI-driven assessment scoring of candidate responses.
§ The record
ConverzAI is filed under Screening AI, HireVue under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only HireVue is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | ConverzAI | HireVue |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2019 | 2004 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 48% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
ConverzAI 30 · HireVue 65
7.0 weighted points to HireVue
15% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
ConverzAI 40 · HireVue 55
2.3 weighted points to HireVue
12% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
ConverzAI 45 · HireVue 60
1.8 weighted points to HireVue
18% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
ConverzAI 72 · HireVue 80
1.4 weighted points to HireVue
8% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
ConverzAI 45 · HireVue 55
0.8 weighted points to HireVue
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
ConverzAI 30 · HireVue 35
0.8 weighted points to HireVue
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
ConverzAI 50 · HireVue 45
0.6 weighted points to ConverzAI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -13.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -14 beside that -13.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is ConverzAI minus HireVue.
| Category | Weight | ConverzAI | HireVue | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 65 | -35 | -7.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 72 | 80 | -8 | -1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 55 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 60 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 45 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 55 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 44 (F) | 58 (F) | -14 | -13.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | ConverzAI | HireVue | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 6 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
ConverzAI has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; HireVue has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for ConverzAI and HireVue sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for ConverzAI, across 3 distinct source domains, and 15 for HireVue, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- ConverzAI last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireVue last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next