§ The result
Cornerstone OnDemand leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Cornerstone OnDemand scores 56 to 29 for JobDiva, a 27-point gap between two ATS-integrated entries. Cornerstone OnDemand leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; JobDiva leads none. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Cornerstone OnDemand 72, JobDiva 28, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 33% of the weighted advantage Cornerstone OnDemand holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Cornerstone OnDemand
Cornerstone OnDemand is an enterprise talent-management and learning suite whose Cornerstone Galaxy platform uses AI-driven skills extraction and matching (including the acquired SkyHive Skills Models) to power recruiting, candidate screening, and workforce development.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
§ The record
Cornerstone OnDemand and JobDiva are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Cornerstone OnDemand is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Cornerstone OnDemand | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 1999 | 2003 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Cornerstone OnDemand 72 · JobDiva 28
8.8 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand
18% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Cornerstone OnDemand 58 · JobDiva 15
7.7 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand
15% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Cornerstone OnDemand 60 · JobDiva 38
3.3 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Cornerstone OnDemand 35 · JobDiva 22
1.9 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Cornerstone OnDemand 55 · JobDiva 40
1.8 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Cornerstone OnDemand 45 · JobDiva 30
1.8 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Cornerstone OnDemand 60 · JobDiva 42
1.4 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +26.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 26.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +27 beside that +26.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cornerstone OnDemand minus JobDiva.
| Category | Weight | Cornerstone OnDemand | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 72 | 28 | +44 | +8.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 58 | 15 | +43 | +7.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 22 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 38 | +22 | +3.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 40 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 30 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 42 | +18 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 56 (F) | 29 (F) | +27 | +26.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cornerstone OnDemand | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 15 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Cornerstone OnDemand has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cornerstone OnDemand sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Cornerstone OnDemand, across 2 distinct source domains, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cornerstone OnDemand last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next