HomeCompareCornerstone OnDemand vs Juicebox (PeopleGPT)

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Cornerstone OnDemand vs Juicebox (PeopleGPT)

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Juicebox (PeopleGPT) takes the total, Cornerstone OnDemand takes more of the criteria.

Juicebox (PeopleGPT) (Sourcing) edges Cornerstone OnDemand (ATS-integrated) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 57 to 56. Cornerstone OnDemand leads more of the criteria than Juicebox (PeopleGPT) — 3 to 2 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which Juicebox (PeopleGPT) leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Juicebox (PeopleGPT). Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Cornerstone OnDemand 58, Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 84 — and at an 18% weight it carries 80% of the weighted advantage Juicebox (PeopleGPT) holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Cornerstone OnDemand is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Juicebox (PeopleGPT) under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Cornerstone OnDemand is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCornerstone OnDemandJuicebox (PeopleGPT)
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19992022

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 42% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Cornerstone OnDemand 58 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 84

    4.7 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)

  2. 20% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Cornerstone OnDemand 72 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 52

    4.0 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  3. 12% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Cornerstone OnDemand 45 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 55

    1.2 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)

  4. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Cornerstone OnDemand 60 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 56

    0.6 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  5. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Cornerstone OnDemand 55 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 50

    0.6 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -0.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -0.7.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Cornerstone OnDemand minus Juicebox (PeopleGPT).

CategoryWeightCornerstone OnDemandJuicebox (PeopleGPT)Δ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7252+20+4.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%5884-26-4.7
FRIA Support15%3535--
Data Governance Disclosure15%6056+4+0.6
Human Oversight Design12%5550+5+0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%4555-10-1.2
Customer Documentation8%6060--
Total100%56 (F)57 (F)-1-0.7

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCornerstone OnDemandJuicebox (PeopleGPT)
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%155Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain124Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Cornerstone OnDemand has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Juicebox (PeopleGPT) has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cornerstone OnDemand and Juicebox (PeopleGPT) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 36 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Cornerstone OnDemand, across 2 distinct source domains, and 16 for Juicebox (PeopleGPT), across 4 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Cornerstone OnDemand last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.