HomeCompareCornerstone OnDemand vs Recruit CRM

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Cornerstone OnDemand vs Recruit CRM

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Cornerstone OnDemand leads Recruit CRM by 16 points.

Cornerstone OnDemand finishes 16 points clear of Recruit CRM inside the ATS-integrated cohort under rubric v1.0: 56 against 40. Cornerstone OnDemand leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Recruit CRM leads 1, including Human Oversight Design, and 1 is level. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Cornerstone OnDemand 72, Recruit CRM 34) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 48% of the weighted advantage Cornerstone OnDemand holds across the 5 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Cornerstone OnDemand and Recruit CRM are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Cornerstone OnDemand is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCornerstone OnDemandRecruit CRM
Price tierEnterpriseLow
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded1999Not recorded

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 47% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Cornerstone OnDemand 72 · Recruit CRM 34

    7.6 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  2. 18% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Cornerstone OnDemand 58 · Recruit CRM 20

    6.8 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  3. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Cornerstone OnDemand 60 · Recruit CRM 54

    0.9 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  4. 12% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Cornerstone OnDemand 55 · Recruit CRM 58

    0.4 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  5. 12% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Cornerstone OnDemand 45 · Recruit CRM 42

    0.4 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  6. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Cornerstone OnDemand 35 · Recruit CRM 34

    0.1 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +15.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +16 beside that +15.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Cornerstone OnDemand minus Recruit CRM.

CategoryWeightCornerstone OnDemandRecruit CRMΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7234+38+7.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%5820+38+6.8
FRIA Support15%3534+1+0.1
Data Governance Disclosure15%6054+6+0.9
Human Oversight Design12%5558-3-0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%4542+3+0.4
Customer Documentation8%6060--
Total100%56 (F)40 (F)+16+15.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCornerstone OnDemandRecruit CRM
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21—
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%155Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain305Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Cornerstone OnDemand has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Recruit CRM has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cornerstone OnDemand and Recruit CRM sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Cornerstone OnDemand, across 2 distinct source domains, and 35 for Recruit CRM, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Cornerstone OnDemand last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Recruit CRM last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.