HomeCompareCovey vs Entelo

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Covey vs Entelo

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Covey leads Entelo by 14 points.

Covey sits 14 points above Entelo under rubric v1.0, 47 against 33, with both filed under Sourcing. Covey leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Entelo leads 1, including Post-Market Monitoring, and 1 is level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Covey 72, Entelo 20 — and at an 18% weight it carries 62% of the weighted advantage Covey holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Covey and Entelo are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordCoveyEntelo
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20182011

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 60% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Covey 72 · Entelo 20

    9.4 weighted points to Covey

  2. 20% weight · 73% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Covey 40 · Entelo 30

    2.0 weighted points to Covey

  3. 8% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Covey 58 · Entelo 40

    1.4 weighted points to Covey

  4. 12% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Covey 52 · Entelo 42

    1.2 weighted points to Covey

  5. 15% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Covey 52 · Entelo 45

    1.1 weighted points to Covey

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Covey 30 · Entelo 35

    0.6 weighted points to Entelo

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +14.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +14 beside that +14.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Covey minus Entelo.

CategoryWeightCoveyEnteloΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4030+10+2.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%7220+52+9.4
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5245+7+1.1
Human Oversight Design12%5242+10+1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3035-5-0.6
Customer Documentation8%5840+18+1.4
Total100%47 (F)33 (F)+14+14.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCoveyEntelo
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on a separate domain22
FRIA Support15%0101
Data Governance Disclosure15%0111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11
Post-Market Monitoring12%0121Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%65Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain98Sources on the vendor's own domain

Covey has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Covey sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 27 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Covey, across 2 distinct source domains, and 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Covey last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Entelo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.