HomeCompareCovey vs HighMatch

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Covey vs HighMatch

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Covey takes the total, HighMatch takes more of the criteria.

Covey (Sourcing) edges HighMatch (Assessment) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 47 to 43. HighMatch leads more of the criteria than Covey — 4 to 1 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which Covey leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Covey. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Covey 72, HighMatch 30) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 100% of the weighted advantage Covey holds across the 1 criterion it leads.

§ The record

Covey is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HighMatch under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only HighMatch is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCoveyHighMatch
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20182005

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 66% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Covey 72 · HighMatch 30

    7.6 weighted points to Covey

  2. 12% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Covey 30 · HighMatch 40

    1.2 weighted points to HighMatch

  3. 20% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Covey 40 · HighMatch 45

    1.0 weighted points to HighMatch

  4. 12% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Covey 52 · HighMatch 60

    1.0 weighted points to HighMatch

  5. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Covey 25 · HighMatch 30

    0.8 weighted points to HighMatch

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +3.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +3.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Covey minus HighMatch.

CategoryWeightCoveyHighMatchΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4045-5-1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%7230+42+7.6
FRIA Support15%2530-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5252--
Human Oversight Design12%5260-8-1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%3040-10-1.2
Customer Documentation8%5858--
Total100%47 (F)43 (F)+4+3.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCoveyHighMatch
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%01—31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%01—50Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%01—31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%65Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain314Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Covey has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; HighMatch has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Covey and HighMatch sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Covey, across 2 distinct source domains, and 35 for HighMatch, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Covey last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HighMatch last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.