HomeCompareCovey vs Keka

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Covey vs Keka

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Covey leads Keka by 10 points.

Covey, filed under Sourcing, comes out 10 points above Keka, filed under ATS-integrated: 47 against 37 under rubric v1.0. Keka takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Post-Market Monitoring among them, against 5 for Covey, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Covey 72, Keka 20 — and at an 18% weight it carries 77% of the weighted advantage Covey holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Covey is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Keka under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordCoveyKeka
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersUSIN
Founded20182014

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 66% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Covey 72 · Keka 20

    9.4 weighted points to Covey

  2. 20% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Covey 40 · Keka 30

    2.0 weighted points to Covey

  3. 12% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Covey 30 · Keka 40

    1.2 weighted points to Keka

  4. 15% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Covey 25 · Keka 30

    0.8 weighted points to Keka

  5. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Covey 52 · Keka 50

    0.3 weighted points to Covey

  6. 12% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Covey 52 · Keka 50

    0.2 weighted points to Covey

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Covey 58 · Keka 55

    0.2 weighted points to Covey

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +10.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +10.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Covey minus Keka.

CategoryWeightCoveyKekaΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4030+10+2.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%7220+52+9.4
FRIA Support15%2530-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5250+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5250+2+0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3040-10-1.2
Customer Documentation8%5855+3+0.2
Total100%47 (F)37 (F)+10+10.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCoveyKeka
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%01—21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%01—51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain71Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%01—31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%65Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain287Sources on the vendor's own domain

Covey has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Keka has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Covey sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Covey, across 2 distinct source domains, and 35 for Keka, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Covey last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Keka last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.