HomeCompareCovey vs Phenom

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Covey vs Phenom

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Phenom leads Covey by 5 points.

Phenom scores 52 and Covey 47 under rubric v1.0 — a 5-point gap inside the Sourcing cohort. Phenom leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Covey leads 1, including Customer Documentation, and 2 are level. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Covey 40, Phenom 55 — and at a 20% weight it carries 53% of the weighted advantage Phenom holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Covey and Phenom are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordCoveyPhenom
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20182010

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 51% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Covey 40 · Phenom 55

    3.0 weighted points to Phenom

  2. 15% weight · 71% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Covey 52 · Phenom 60

    1.2 weighted points to Phenom

  3. 12% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Covey 52 · Phenom 60

    1.0 weighted points to Phenom

  4. 18% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Covey 72 · Phenom 75

    0.5 weighted points to Phenom

  5. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Covey 58 · Phenom 55

    0.2 weighted points to Covey

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -5.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -5 beside that -5.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Covey minus Phenom.

CategoryWeightCoveyPhenomΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4055-15-3.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%7275-3-0.5
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5260-8-1.2
Human Oversight Design12%5260-8-1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%3030--
Customer Documentation8%5855+3+0.2
Total100%47 (F)52 (F)-5-5.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCoveyPhenom
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on a separate domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%0101
Data Governance Disclosure15%0110Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain10
Post-Market Monitoring12%0101
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%65Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain82Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Covey has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Phenom has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Covey sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 21 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Covey, across 2 distinct source domains, and 10 for Phenom, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Covey last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Phenom last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.