HomeCompareCovey vs Vervoe

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Covey vs Vervoe

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Covey takes the total, Vervoe takes more of the criteria.

Covey (Sourcing) edges Vervoe (Assessment) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 47 to 46. Vervoe leads more of the criteria than Covey — 3 to 2 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which Covey leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Covey. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Covey 72, Vervoe 52 — and at an 18% weight it carries 94% of the weighted advantage Covey holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Covey is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Vervoe under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Vervoe is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCoveyVervoe
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSAU
Founded20182016

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 58% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Covey 72 · Vervoe 52

    3.6 weighted points to Covey

  2. 20% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Covey 40 · Vervoe 45

    1.0 weighted points to Vervoe

  3. 12% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Covey 52 · Vervoe 60

    1.0 weighted points to Vervoe

  4. 15% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Covey 52 · Vervoe 55

    0.4 weighted points to Vervoe

  5. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Covey 30 · Vervoe 28

    0.2 weighted points to Covey

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +1.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Covey minus Vervoe.

CategoryWeightCoveyVervoeΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4045-5-1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%7252+20+3.6
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5255-3-0.4
Human Oversight Design12%5260-8-1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%3028+2+0.2
Customer Documentation8%5858--
Total100%47 (F)46 (F)+1+1.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCoveyVervoe
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on a separate domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%0101
Data Governance Disclosure15%0140Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%0111
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%65Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain155Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Covey has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Vervoe has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Covey sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 31 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Covey, across 2 distinct source domains, and 20 for Vervoe, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Covey last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Vervoe last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.