HomeCompareCriteria vs LinkedIn Recruiter

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Criteria vs LinkedIn Recruiter

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

4 points separate LinkedIn Recruiter and Criteria.

LinkedIn Recruiter (Sourcing) edges Criteria (Assessment) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 57 to 53. LinkedIn Recruiter leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Human Oversight Design, while Criteria leads 1, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, and 1 is level. Even Human Oversight Design, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Criteria 56, LinkedIn Recruiter 66, 12% weight), is only 30% of the weighted advantage LinkedIn Recruiter builds across the 5 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Criteria is filed under Assessment AI, LinkedIn Recruiter under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Criteria is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCriteriaLinkedIn Recruiter
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20062002

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 12% weight · 28% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Criteria 56 · LinkedIn Recruiter 66

    1.2 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  2. 12% weight · 51% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Criteria 42 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50

    1.0 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  3. 15% weight · 72% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Criteria 32 · LinkedIn Recruiter 38

    0.9 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  4. 8% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Criteria 60 · LinkedIn Recruiter 68

    0.6 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  5. 18% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Criteria 48 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50

    0.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  6. 20% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Criteria 68 · LinkedIn Recruiter 67

    0.2 weighted points to Criteria

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -3.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -4 beside that -3.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Criteria minus LinkedIn Recruiter.

CategoryWeightCriteriaLinkedIn RecruiterΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6867+1+0.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%4850-2-0.4
FRIA Support15%3238-6-0.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%6262--
Human Oversight Design12%5666-10-1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4250-8-1.0
Customer Documentation8%6068-8-0.6
Total100%53 (F)57 (F)-4-3.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCriteriaLinkedIn Recruiter
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11—41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%144Sources on the vendor's own domain345Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Criteria has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 57 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Criteria, across 1 distinct source domain, and 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Criteria last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.