HomeCompareCriteria vs Paycor

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Criteria vs Paycor

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Criteria leads Paycor on all 7 criteria.

Criteria sits 13 points above Paycor under rubric v1.0 — 53 against 40 — with Criteria filed under Assessment and Paycor under ATS-integrated. Criteria leads every one of the 7 criteria, Paycor none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, Criteria 56 to Paycor 55. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Criteria 68, Paycor 40) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 42% of the weighted advantage Criteria holds across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Criteria is filed under Assessment AI, Paycor under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Criteria is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCriteriaPaycor
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20061990

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 42% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Criteria 68 · Paycor 40

    5.6 weighted points to Criteria

  2. 18% weight · 73% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Criteria 48 · Paycor 25

    4.1 weighted points to Criteria

  3. 15% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Criteria 62 · Paycor 50

    1.8 weighted points to Criteria

  4. 15% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Criteria 32 · Paycor 27

    0.8 weighted points to Criteria

  5. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Criteria 42 · Paycor 38

    0.5 weighted points to Criteria

  6. 8% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Criteria 60 · Paycor 55

    0.4 weighted points to Criteria

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Criteria 56 · Paycor 55

    0.1 weighted points to Criteria

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +13.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +13 beside that +13.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Criteria minus Paycor.

CategoryWeightCriteriaPaycorΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6840+28+5.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%4825+23+4.1
FRIA Support15%3227+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%6250+12+1.8
Human Oversight Design12%5655+1+0.1
Post-Market Monitoring12%4238+4+0.5
Customer Documentation8%6055+5+0.4
Total100%53 (F)40 (F)+13+13.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCriteriaPaycor
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11—31—
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%144Sources on the vendor's own domain246Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Criteria has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Paycor has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Paycor sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Criteria, across 1 distinct source domain, and 30 for Paycor, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Criteria last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Paycor last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.