HomeCompareCrosschq vs Eightfold AI

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Crosschq vs Eightfold AI

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Eightfold AI leads Crosschq by 17 points.

Eightfold AI finishes 17 points clear of Crosschq under rubric v1.0 — 64 (D) against 47 (F) — across the Sourcing and Screening cohorts. Eightfold AI leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Crosschq leads 2, including Human Oversight Design. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Crosschq 38, Eightfold AI 85) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 49% of the weighted advantage Eightfold AI holds across the 5 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Crosschq is filed under Screening AI, Eightfold AI under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Crosschq is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCrosschqEightfold AI
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20182016

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 48% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Crosschq 38 · Eightfold AI 85

    8.5 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  2. 20% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Crosschq 50 · Eightfold AI 75

    5.0 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  3. 15% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Crosschq 30 · Eightfold AI 45

    2.3 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  4. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Crosschq 40 · Eightfold AI 50

    1.2 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  5. 15% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Crosschq 58 · Eightfold AI 60

    0.3 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  6. 12% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Crosschq 62 · Eightfold AI 60

    0.2 weighted points to Crosschq

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Crosschq 62 · Eightfold AI 60

    0.2 weighted points to Crosschq

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -16.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -17 beside that -16.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Crosschq minus Eightfold AI.

CategoryWeightCrosschqEightfold AIΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5075-25-5.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3885-47-8.5
FRIA Support15%3045-15-2.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5860-2-0.3
Human Oversight Design12%6260+2+0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4050-10-1.2
Customer Documentation8%6260+2+0.2
Total100%47 (F)64 (D)-17-16.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCrosschqEightfold AI
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%61Sources on the vendor's own domain30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%70Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain10—
Human Oversight Design12%70Sources on the vendor's own domain10—
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%385Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain132Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Crosschq has 43 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 38 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Eightfold AI has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Crosschq and Eightfold AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 43 for Crosschq, across 3 distinct source domains, and 15 for Eightfold AI, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Crosschq last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Eightfold AI last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.